WallStSmart

Fossil Group Inc (FOSL)vsSteven Madden Ltd (SHOO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Steven Madden Ltd generates 178% more annual revenue ($2.74B vs $985.17M). SHOO leads profitability with a 5.2% profit margin vs -7.1%. FOSL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.23. SHOO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

FOSL

Avoid

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 7.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.36

SHOO

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 6.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.60
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FOSLUndervalued (+72.5%)

Margin of Safety

+72.5%

Fair Value

$14.25

Current Price

$4.73

$9.52 discount

UndervaluedFair: $14.25Overvalued
SHOOUndervalued (+58.9%)

Margin of Safety

+58.9%

Fair Value

$93.83

Current Price

$42.93

$50.90 discount

UndervaluedFair: $93.83Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FOSL1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
3.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SHOO3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
75.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 75.4% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.6010/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Revenue GrowthGrowth
19.1%8/10

19.1% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

FOSL4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$288.59M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
3.5%3/10

Operating margin of 3.5%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-58.3%2/10

ROE of -58.3% — below average capital efficiency

SHOO3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.174/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FOSL

The strongest argument for FOSL centers on Price/Book. PEG of 1.23 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SHOO

The strongest argument for SHOO centers on EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 19.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FOSL

The primary concerns for FOSL are Market Cap, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 3.80 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : SHOO

The primary concerns for SHOO are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FOSL profiles as a turnaround stock while SHOO is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

FOSL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.63 — expect wider price swings.

SHOO is growing revenue faster at 19.1% — sustainability is the question.

SHOO generates stronger free cash flow (205M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SHOO scores higher overall (61/100 vs 35/100) and 19.1% revenue growth. FOSL offers better value entry with a 72.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Fossil Group Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA

Fossil Group, Inc. designs, develops, markets, and distributes consumer fashion accessories in the United States, Europe, Asia, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Richardson, Texas.

Steven Madden Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA

Steven Madden, Ltd. designs, supplies, markets and sells private label and brand name footwear for women, men and children in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Long Island City, New York.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?