WallStSmart

Crocs Inc (CROX)vsSteven Madden Ltd (SHOO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crocs Inc generates 53% more annual revenue ($4.02B vs $2.63B). SHOO leads profitability with a 2.9% profit margin vs -2.6%. CROX appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.39. SHOO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

CROX

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.0Value: 6.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 3.16

SHOO

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.5Value: 6.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.60
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CROXUndervalued (+27.5%)

Margin of Safety

+27.5%

Fair Value

$114.12

Current Price

$119.35

$5.23 discount

UndervaluedFair: $114.12Overvalued
SHOOUndervalued (+58.1%)

Margin of Safety

+58.1%

Fair Value

$92.18

Current Price

$44.03

$48.15 discount

UndervaluedFair: $92.18Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CROX2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1610/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Operating MarginProfitability
22.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.2%

SHOO3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
75.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 75.4% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.6010/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Revenue GrowthGrowth
18.0%8/10

18.0% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

CROX4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.213/10

Elevated debt levels

Return on EquityProfitability
-7.3%2/10

ROE of -7.3% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.7%2/10

Revenue declined 1.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-4.2%2/10

Earnings declined 4.2%

SHOO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.174/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
2.9%3/10

2.9% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
43.5x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CROX

The strongest argument for CROX centers on Altman Z-Score, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.39 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SHOO

The strongest argument for SHOO centers on EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 18.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CROX

The primary concerns for CROX are Debt/Equity, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : SHOO

The primary concerns for SHOO are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 43.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CROX profiles as a turnaround stock while SHOO is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CROX carries more volatility with a beta of 1.56 — expect wider price swings.

SHOO is growing revenue faster at 18.0% — sustainability is the question.

SHOO generates stronger free cash flow (-61M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SHOO scores higher overall (59/100 vs 44/100) and 18.0% revenue growth. CROX offers better value entry with a 27.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crocs Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA

Crocs, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, markets and distributes casual lifestyle footwear and accessories for men, women and children. The company is headquartered in Broomfield, Colorado.

Steven Madden Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA

Steven Madden, Ltd. designs, supplies, markets and sells private label and brand name footwear for women, men and children in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Long Island City, New York.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?