WallStSmart

Crocs Inc (CROX)vsFossil Group Inc (FOSL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crocs Inc generates 304% more annual revenue ($4.02B vs $995.91M). CROX leads profitability with a -2.6% profit margin vs -6.2%. FOSL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.23. CROX earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 44/100 (D).

CROX

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.0Value: 6.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 3.16

FOSL

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.5Value: 7.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.61
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CROXUndervalued (+27.5%)

Margin of Safety

+27.5%

Fair Value

$114.12

Current Price

$119.35

$5.23 discount

UndervaluedFair: $114.12Overvalued
FOSLUndervalued (+73.6%)

Margin of Safety

+73.6%

Fair Value

$14.84

Current Price

$4.01

$10.83 discount

UndervaluedFair: $14.84Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CROX2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1610/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Operating MarginProfitability
22.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.2%

FOSL1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CROX4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.213/10

Elevated debt levels

Return on EquityProfitability
-7.3%2/10

ROE of -7.3% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.7%2/10

Revenue declined 1.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-4.2%2/10

Earnings declined 4.2%

FOSL4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.614/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$234.04M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-58.3%2/10

ROE of -58.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CROX

The strongest argument for CROX centers on Altman Z-Score, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.39 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : FOSL

The strongest argument for FOSL centers on Price/Book. PEG of 1.23 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CROX

The primary concerns for CROX are Debt/Equity, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : FOSL

The primary concerns for FOSL are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 3.49 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FOSL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.65 — expect wider price swings.

CROX is growing revenue faster at -1.7% — sustainability is the question.

FOSL generates stronger free cash flow (-23M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CROX scores higher overall (44/100 vs 38/100). FOSL offers better value entry with a 73.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crocs Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA

Crocs, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, markets and distributes casual lifestyle footwear and accessories for men, women and children. The company is headquartered in Broomfield, Colorado.

Fossil Group Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA

Fossil Group, Inc. designs, develops, markets, and distributes consumer fashion accessories in the United States, Europe, Asia, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Richardson, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?