Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN)vsYum! Brands Inc (YUM)
DIN
Dine Brands Global Inc
$36.33
-2.29%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $461.93M
YUM
Yum! Brands Inc
$159.34
-0.54%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $42.98B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Yum! Brands Inc generates 878% more annual revenue ($8.80B vs $899.90M). YUM leads profitability with a 39.1% profit margin vs 0.8%. DIN appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.29. YUM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).
DIN
Hold46
out of 100
Grade: D+
YUM
Buy59
out of 100
Grade: C
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+48.5%
Fair Value
$67.43
Current Price
$36.33
$31.10 discount
Margin of Safety
-72.2%
Fair Value
$92.35
Current Price
$159.34
$66.99 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Keeps 39 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 32.1%
Earnings expanding 319.9% YoY
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Areas to Watch
4.4% revenue growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency
0.8% margin — thin
Expensive relative to growth rate
3.8% revenue growth
ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency
Weak financial health signals
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : DIN
The strongest argument for DIN centers on Debt/Equity. PEG of 1.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : YUM
The strongest argument for YUM centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 39.1% and operating margin at 32.1%.
Bear Case : DIN
The primary concerns for DIN are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity. A P/E of 59.8x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 0.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : YUM
The primary concerns for YUM are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Return on Equity.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
DIN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.93 — expect wider price swings.
DIN is growing revenue faster at 4.4% — sustainability is the question.
YUM generates stronger free cash flow (388M), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor RESTAURANTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
YUM scores higher overall (59/100 vs 46/100), backed by strong 39.1% margins. DIN offers better value entry with a 48.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Dine Brands Global Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA
Dine Brands Global, Inc. owns, franchises, operates and leases full service restaurants in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Glendale, California.
Visit Website →Yum! Brands Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA
Yum! Brands, Inc. is an American fast food corporation listed on the Fortune 1000. Yum! operates the brands KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, The Habit Burger Grill, and WingStreet worldwide, except in China, where the brands are operated by a separate company, Yum China.
Compare with Other RESTAURANTS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?