WallStSmart

Darden Restaurants Inc (DRI)vsYum! Brands Inc (YUM)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Darden Restaurants Inc generates 53% more annual revenue ($13.37B vs $8.72B). YUM leads profitability with a 25.4% profit margin vs 8.8%. YUM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.90. YUM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

DRI

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 4.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.40

YUM

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.5Value: 4.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DRISignificantly Overvalued (-81.9%)

Margin of Safety

-81.9%

Fair Value

$117.01

Current Price

$219.39

$102.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $117.01Overvalued
YUMSignificantly Overvalued (-77.1%)

Margin of Safety

-77.1%

Fair Value

$89.82

Current Price

$157.01

$67.19 premium

UndervaluedFair: $89.82Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DRI1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
57.2%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 57 in profit

YUM4 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
Operating MarginProfitability
32.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 32.8%

EPS GrowthGrowth
131.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 131.6% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
-1.7310/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Profit MarginProfitability
25.4%9/10

Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

DRI4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.194/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
12.0x4/10

Trading at 12.0x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
-6.7%2/10

Earnings declined 6.7%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.402/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

YUM4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.904/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.922/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DRI

The strongest argument for DRI centers on Return on Equity.

Bull Case : YUM

The strongest argument for YUM centers on Operating Margin, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 25.4% and operating margin at 32.8%. Revenue growth of 12.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : DRI

The primary concerns for DRI are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 3.20 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : YUM

The primary concerns for YUM are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DRI profiles as a value stock while YUM is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

DRI carries more volatility with a beta of 0.62 — expect wider price swings.

YUM is growing revenue faster at 12.2% — sustainability is the question.

YUM generates stronger free cash flow (407M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

YUM scores higher overall (65/100 vs 51/100), backed by strong 25.4% margins and 12.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Darden Restaurants Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Darden Restaurants, Inc. is an American multi-brand restaurant operator headquartered in Orlando.

Yum! Brands Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Yum! Brands, Inc. is an American fast food corporation listed on the Fortune 1000. Yum! operates the brands KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, The Habit Burger Grill, and WingStreet worldwide, except in China, where the brands are operated by a separate company, Yum China.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?