WallStSmart

Restaurant Brands International Inc (QSR)vsYum! Brands Inc (YUM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc generates 15% more annual revenue ($9.43B vs $8.21B). YUM leads profitability with a 19.0% profit margin vs 8.2%. QSR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.16. YUM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

QSR

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 7.3Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.93

YUM

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.0Value: 10.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

QSRSignificantly Overvalued (-295.4%)

Margin of Safety

-295.4%

Fair Value

$17.88

Current Price

$73.75

$55.87 premium

UndervaluedFair: $17.88Overvalued
YUMUndervalued (+38.8%)

Margin of Safety

+38.8%

Fair Value

$259.74

Current Price

$156.41

$103.33 discount

UndervaluedFair: $259.74Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

QSR2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
24.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
26.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.4%

YUM2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
31.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 31.9%

EPS GrowthGrowth
27.7%8/10

Earnings expanding 27.7% YoY

Areas to Watch

QSR3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.0x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
-57.4%2/10

Earnings declined 57.4%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.932/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

YUM4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.964/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
28.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : QSR

The strongest argument for QSR centers on Return on Equity, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.16 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : YUM

The strongest argument for YUM centers on Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.0% and operating margin at 31.9%.

Bear Case : QSR

The primary concerns for QSR are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : YUM

The primary concerns for YUM are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

QSR profiles as a value stock while YUM is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

YUM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.64 — expect wider price swings.

QSR is growing revenue faster at 7.4% — sustainability is the question.

YUM generates stronger free cash flow (482M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

YUM scores higher overall (59/100 vs 57/100), backed by strong 19.0% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Restaurant Brands International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK) and Popeyes (PLK) brands. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Yum! Brands Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Yum! Brands, Inc. is an American fast food corporation listed on the Fortune 1000. Yum! operates the brands KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, The Habit Burger Grill, and WingStreet worldwide, except in China, where the brands are operated by a separate company, Yum China.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?