Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN)vsMcDonald’s Corporation (MCD)
DIN
Dine Brands Global Inc
$28.17
-2.90%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $358.13M
MCD
McDonald’s Corporation
$236.50
-0.22%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $167.73B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
McDonald’s Corporation generates 2978% more annual revenue ($27.70B vs $899.90M). MCD leads profitability with a 31.7% profit margin vs 0.8%. DIN appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.29. MCD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).
DIN
Hold46
out of 100
Grade: D+
MCD
Buy53
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+49.2%
Fair Value
$68.23
Current Price
$28.17
$40.06 discount
Margin of Safety
-52.2%
Fair Value
$155.74
Current Price
$236.50
$80.76 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Keeps 32 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 46.5%
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Large-cap with strong market position
Generating 2.0B in free cash flow
Areas to Watch
4.4% revenue growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency
0.8% margin — thin
Expensive relative to growth rate
3.7% revenue growth
ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency
Weak financial health signals
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : DIN
The strongest argument for DIN centers on Debt/Equity. PEG of 1.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : MCD
The strongest argument for MCD centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 31.7% and operating margin at 46.5%.
Bear Case : DIN
The primary concerns for DIN are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity. A P/E of 45.6x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 0.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : MCD
The primary concerns for MCD are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Return on Equity.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
DIN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.95 — expect wider price swings.
DIN is growing revenue faster at 4.4% — sustainability is the question.
MCD generates stronger free cash flow (2.0B), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor RESTAURANTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
MCD scores higher overall (53/100 vs 46/100), backed by strong 31.7% margins. DIN offers better value entry with a 49.2% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Dine Brands Global Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA
Dine Brands Global, Inc. owns, franchises, operates and leases full service restaurants in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Glendale, California.
Visit Website →McDonald’s Corporation
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA
McDonald's Corporation is an American fast food company, founded in 1940 as a restaurant operated by Richard and Maurice McDonald, in San Bernardino, California, United States. They rechristened their business as a hamburger stand, and later turned the company into a franchise, with the Golden Arches logo being introduced in 1953 at a location in Phoenix, Arizona.
Visit Website →Compare with Other RESTAURANTS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?