Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN)vsMcDonald’s Corporation (MCD)
DIN
Dine Brands Global Inc
$34.10
+1.24%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $424.45M
MCD
McDonald’s Corporation
$269.76
+1.97%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $191.67B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
McDonald’s Corporation generates 2985% more annual revenue ($27.45B vs $889.70M). MCD leads profitability with a 31.6% profit margin vs 1.8%. DIN appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.29. MCD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).
DIN
Hold50
out of 100
Grade: D+
MCD
Buy55
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+49.2%
Fair Value
$68.29
Current Price
$34.10
$34.19 discount
Margin of Safety
-78.5%
Fair Value
$151.11
Current Price
$269.76
$118.65 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Keeps 32 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 44.3%
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Large-cap with strong market position
Generating 1.7B in free cash flow
Areas to Watch
Moderate valuation
4.8% revenue growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency
Expensive relative to growth rate
ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency
Weak financial health signals
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : DIN
The strongest argument for DIN centers on Debt/Equity. PEG of 1.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : MCD
The strongest argument for MCD centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 31.6% and operating margin at 44.3%.
Bear Case : DIN
The primary concerns for DIN are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Market Cap. Thin 1.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : MCD
The primary concerns for MCD are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
DIN profiles as a value stock while MCD is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
DIN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.99 — expect wider price swings.
MCD is growing revenue faster at 9.4% — sustainability is the question.
MCD generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
MCD scores higher overall (55/100 vs 50/100), backed by strong 31.6% margins. DIN offers better value entry with a 49.2% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Dine Brands Global Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA
Dine Brands Global, Inc. owns, franchises, operates and leases full service restaurants in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Glendale, California.
Visit Website →McDonald’s Corporation
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA
McDonald's Corporation is an American fast food company, founded in 1940 as a restaurant operated by Richard and Maurice McDonald, in San Bernardino, California, United States. They rechristened their business as a hamburger stand, and later turned the company into a franchise, with the Golden Arches logo being introduced in 1953 at a location in Phoenix, Arizona.
Visit Website →Compare with Other RESTAURANTS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?