Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN)vsDarden Restaurants Inc (DRI)
DIN
Dine Brands Global Inc
$28.17
-2.90%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $358.13M
DRI
Darden Restaurants Inc
$199.75
-3.61%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $23.76B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Darden Restaurants Inc generates 1368% more annual revenue ($13.21B vs $899.90M). DRI leads profitability with a 9.1% profit margin vs 0.8%. DIN appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.29. DRI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).
DIN
Hold46
out of 100
Grade: D+
DRI
Strong Buy67
out of 100
Grade: B-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+49.2%
Fair Value
$68.23
Current Price
$28.17
$40.06 discount
Margin of Safety
-86.1%
Fair Value
$114.33
Current Price
$199.75
$85.42 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Every $100 of equity generates 55 in profit
Earnings expanding 36.0% YoY
Areas to Watch
4.4% revenue growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency
0.8% margin — thin
Expensive relative to growth rate
Trading at 10.3x book value
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : DIN
The strongest argument for DIN centers on Debt/Equity. PEG of 1.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : DRI
The strongest argument for DRI centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 13.7% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : DIN
The primary concerns for DIN are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity. A P/E of 45.6x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 0.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : DRI
The primary concerns for DRI are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow. Debt-to-equity of 2.74 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
DIN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.95 — expect wider price swings.
DRI is growing revenue faster at 13.7% — sustainability is the question.
DIN generates stronger free cash flow (-3M), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor RESTAURANTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
DRI scores higher overall (67/100 vs 46/100) and 13.7% revenue growth. DIN offers better value entry with a 49.2% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Dine Brands Global Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA
Dine Brands Global, Inc. owns, franchises, operates and leases full service restaurants in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Glendale, California.
Visit Website →Darden Restaurants Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA
Darden Restaurants, Inc. is an American multi-brand restaurant operator headquartered in Orlando.
Compare with Other RESTAURANTS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?