WallStSmart

Camping World Holdings Inc (CWH)vsRush Enterprises A Inc (RUSHA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Rush Enterprises A Inc generates 17% more annual revenue ($7.43B vs $6.37B). RUSHA leads profitability with a 3.5% profit margin vs -1.4%. CWH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.70. CWH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (D+).

CWH

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.5Value: 6.3Quality: 5.0

RUSHA

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.5Value: 6.0Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.13
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWHUndervalued (+78.7%)

Margin of Safety

+78.7%

Fair Value

$60.34

Current Price

$8.19

$52.15 discount

UndervaluedFair: $60.34Overvalued
RUSHAUndervalued (+56.7%)

Margin of Safety

+56.7%

Fair Value

$168.59

Current Price

$74.03

$94.56 discount

UndervaluedFair: $168.59Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWH2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
122.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 122.7% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

RUSHA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1310/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CWH4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.704/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Market CapQuality
$440.19M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-24.7%2/10

ROE of -24.7% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-2.6%2/10

Revenue declined 2.6%

RUSHA4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.5%3/10

3.5% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.8%2/10

Revenue declined 11.8%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-11.0%2/10

Earnings declined 11.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWH

The strongest argument for CWH centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book.

Bull Case : RUSHA

The strongest argument for RUSHA centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : CWH

The primary concerns for CWH are PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : RUSHA

The primary concerns for RUSHA are Profit Margin, PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth. Thin 3.5% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWH profiles as a turnaround stock while RUSHA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CWH carries more volatility with a beta of 2.17 — expect wider price swings.

CWH is growing revenue faster at -2.6% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CWH scores higher overall (50/100 vs 44/100). RUSHA offers better value entry with a 56.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Camping World Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Camping World Holdings, Inc., is a recreational vehicle (RV) and outdoor retailer. The company is headquartered in Lincolnshire, Illinois.

Rush Enterprises A Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?