WallStSmart

Lithia Motors Inc (LAD)vsRush Enterprises A Inc (RUSHA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lithia Motors Inc generates 406% more annual revenue ($37.63B vs $7.43B). RUSHA leads profitability with a 3.5% profit margin vs 2.2%. LAD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.44. LAD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

LAD

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.51

RUSHA

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.13
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LADSignificantly Overvalued (-45.8%)

Margin of Safety

-45.8%

Fair Value

$219.78

Current Price

$243.00

$23.22 premium

UndervaluedFair: $219.78Overvalued
RUSHASignificantly Overvalued (-229.0%)

Margin of Safety

-229.0%

Fair Value

$22.17

Current Price

$63.01

$40.84 premium

UndervaluedFair: $22.17Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LAD4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4410/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
7.5x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
30.0%10/10

Revenue surging 30.0% year-over-year

RUSHA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1310/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

LAD4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Profit MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

2.2% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.9%3/10

Operating margin of 3.9%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-28.4%2/10

Earnings declined 28.4%

RUSHA4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.5%3/10

3.5% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.8%2/10

Revenue declined 11.8%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-11.0%2/10

Earnings declined 11.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LAD

The strongest argument for LAD centers on PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 30.0% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.44 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : RUSHA

The strongest argument for RUSHA centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : LAD

The primary concerns for LAD are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 2.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : RUSHA

The primary concerns for RUSHA are Profit Margin, PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth. Thin 3.5% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LAD profiles as a growth stock while RUSHA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

LAD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.20 — expect wider price swings.

LAD is growing revenue faster at 30.0% — sustainability is the question.

LAD generates stronger free cash flow (66M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LAD scores higher overall (58/100 vs 44/100) and 30.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lithia Motors Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Lithia Motors, Inc. is an automobile retailer in the United States. The company is headquartered in Medford, Oregon.

Rush Enterprises A Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?