WallStSmart

Camping World Holdings Inc (CWH)vsLithia Motors Inc (LAD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lithia Motors Inc generates 505% more annual revenue ($37.94B vs $6.27B). LAD leads profitability with a 1.9% profit margin vs -1.6%. LAD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.72. LAD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

CWH

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.5Value: 5.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.63

LAD

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.38
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWHUndervalued (+26.3%)

Margin of Safety

+26.3%

Fair Value

$17.43

Current Price

$6.04

$11.39 discount

UndervaluedFair: $17.43Overvalued
LADUndervalued (+12.0%)

Margin of Safety

+12.0%

Fair Value

$364.07

Current Price

$358.02

$6.05 discount

UndervaluedFair: $364.07Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWH1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

LAD3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PEG RatioValuation
0.728/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
12.2x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

CWH4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.704/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.634/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$416.80M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

LAD4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.2%4/10

2.2% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
1.9%3/10

1.9% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.6%3/10

Operating margin of 4.6%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWH

The strongest argument for CWH centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : LAD

The strongest argument for LAD centers on Price/Book, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. PEG of 0.72 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CWH

The primary concerns for CWH are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap. Debt-to-equity of 15.21 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : LAD

The primary concerns for LAD are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.58 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 1.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWH profiles as a turnaround stock while LAD is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CWH carries more volatility with a beta of 2.09 — expect wider price swings.

LAD is growing revenue faster at 2.2% — sustainability is the question.

CWH generates stronger free cash flow (369M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LAD scores higher overall (61/100 vs 42/100). CWH offers better value entry with a 26.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Camping World Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Camping World Holdings, Inc., is a recreational vehicle (RV) and outdoor retailer. The company is headquartered in Lincolnshire, Illinois.

Lithia Motors Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Lithia Motors, Inc. is an automobile retailer in the United States. The company is headquartered in Medford, Oregon.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?