WallStSmart

Camping World Holdings Inc (CWH)vsRush Enterprises B Inc (RUSHB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Rush Enterprises B Inc generates 15% more annual revenue ($7.27B vs $6.31B). RUSHB leads profitability with a 3.6% profit margin vs -1.5%. CWH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.70. CWH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

CWH

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 3.0Value: 5.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.63

RUSHB

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 5.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.34
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWHUndervalued (+29.4%)

Margin of Safety

+29.4%

Fair Value

$18.20

Current Price

$6.41

$11.79 discount

UndervaluedFair: $18.20Overvalued
RUSHBUndervalued (+20.3%)

Margin of Safety

+20.3%

Fair Value

$82.03

Current Price

$67.00

$15.03 discount

UndervaluedFair: $82.03Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWH2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
122.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 122.7% YoY

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

RUSHB2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.3410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CWH4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.704/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.634/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$477.67M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

Operating margin of 1.6%

RUSHB4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

Operating margin of 4.9%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.742/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWH

The strongest argument for CWH centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book.

Bull Case : RUSHB

The strongest argument for RUSHB centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : CWH

The primary concerns for CWH are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap. Debt-to-equity of 12.57 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : RUSHB

The primary concerns for RUSHB are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWH profiles as a turnaround stock while RUSHB is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CWH carries more volatility with a beta of 2.14 — expect wider price swings.

CWH is growing revenue faster at -4.2% — sustainability is the question.

RUSHB generates stronger free cash flow (21M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CWH scores higher overall (48/100 vs 46/100). RUSHB offers better value entry with a 20.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Camping World Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Camping World Holdings, Inc., is a recreational vehicle (RV) and outdoor retailer. The company is headquartered in Lincolnshire, Illinois.

Rush Enterprises B Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?