WallStSmart

Camping World Holdings Inc (CWH)vsRush Enterprises B Inc (RUSHB)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Rush Enterprises B Inc generates 15% more annual revenue ($7.24B vs $6.27B). RUSHB leads profitability with a 3.7% profit margin vs -1.6%. CWH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.70. RUSHB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D).

CWH

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.5Value: 5.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.63

RUSHB

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 4.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.34
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWHUndervalued (+25.6%)

Margin of Safety

+25.6%

Fair Value

$17.25

Current Price

$4.58

$12.67 discount

UndervaluedFair: $17.25Overvalued
RUSHBFair Value (-3.8%)

Margin of Safety

-3.8%

Fair Value

$62.98

Current Price

$54.21

$8.77 premium

UndervaluedFair: $62.98Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWH1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

RUSHB2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.3410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CWH4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.704/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.634/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$287.86M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

RUSHB4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.0x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

3.7% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWH

The strongest argument for CWH centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : RUSHB

The strongest argument for RUSHB centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : CWH

The primary concerns for CWH are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap. Debt-to-equity of 15.21 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : RUSHB

The primary concerns for RUSHB are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Profit Margin. Thin 3.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWH profiles as a turnaround stock while RUSHB is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CWH carries more volatility with a beta of 2.17 — expect wider price swings.

RUSHB is growing revenue faster at -1.6% — sustainability is the question.

CWH generates stronger free cash flow (369M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

RUSHB scores higher overall (45/100 vs 40/100). CWH offers better value entry with a 25.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Camping World Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Camping World Holdings, Inc., is a recreational vehicle (RV) and outdoor retailer. The company is headquartered in Lincolnshire, Illinois.

Rush Enterprises B Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?