WallStSmart

Penske Automotive Group Inc (PAG)vsRush Enterprises A Inc (RUSHA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Penske Automotive Group Inc generates 336% more annual revenue ($31.72B vs $7.27B). RUSHA leads profitability with a 3.6% profit margin vs 2.9%. PAG appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.29. PAG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

PAG

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.5Value: 5.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.70

RUSHA

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.34

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PAG2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
13.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

RUSHA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.3410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

PAG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.294/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
2.9%3/10

2.9% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

Operating margin of 3.7%

Debt/EquityHealth
1.643/10

Elevated debt levels

RUSHA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

Operating margin of 4.9%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PAG

The strongest argument for PAG centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : RUSHA

The strongest argument for RUSHA centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : PAG

The primary concerns for PAG are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 1.64 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 2.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : RUSHA

The primary concerns for RUSHA are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

RUSHA carries more volatility with a beta of 0.90 — expect wider price swings.

PAG is growing revenue faster at -1.1% — sustainability is the question.

PAG generates stronger free cash flow (152M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

PAG scores higher overall (48/100 vs 47/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Penske Automotive Group Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Penske Automotive Group, Inc., a diversified transportation services company, operates commercial and automotive truck dealerships. The company is headquartered in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan.

Visit Website →

Rush Enterprises A Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?