WallStSmart

GeoPark Ltd (GPRK)vsWoodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Woodside Energy Group Ltd generates 2536% more annual revenue ($12.98B vs $492.50M). WDS leads profitability with a 20.9% profit margin vs 10.1%. GPRK trades at a lower P/E of 9.9x. GPRK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

GPRK

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 8.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.19

WDS

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.37
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

GPRKUndervalued (+80.8%)

Margin of Safety

+80.8%

Fair Value

$44.93

Current Price

$9.47

$35.46 discount

UndervaluedFair: $44.93Overvalued
WDSSignificantly Overvalued (-94.1%)

Margin of Safety

-94.1%

Fair Value

$9.66

Current Price

$23.66

$14.00 premium

UndervaluedFair: $9.66Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GPRK4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
103.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 103.5% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
22.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

WDS3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
20.9%9/10

Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
17.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

GPRK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$493.17M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-23.3%2/10

Revenue declined 23.3%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.192/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

WDS4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.1%2/10

Revenue declined 11.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-14.4%2/10

Earnings declined 14.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GPRK

The strongest argument for GPRK centers on P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Return on Equity.

Bull Case : WDS

The strongest argument for WDS centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.9% and operating margin at 19.1%. PEG of 1.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : GPRK

The primary concerns for GPRK are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.86 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : WDS

The primary concerns for WDS are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GPRK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.43 — expect wider price swings.

WDS is growing revenue faster at -11.1% — sustainability is the question.

WDS generates stronger free cash flow (417M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

GPRK scores higher overall (57/100 vs 53/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

GeoPark Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

GeoPark Limited is engaged in the exploration, development and production of oil and gas reserves in Chile, Colombia, Brazil, Argentina, Peru and Ecuador. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Visit Website →

Woodside Energy Group Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Woodside Energy Group Ltd is engaged in the exploration, evaluation, development, production, marketing and sale of hydrocarbons in Oceania, Asia, Canada, Africa and internationally. The company is headquartered in Perth, Australia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?