Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsWoodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS)
FANG
Diamondback Energy Inc
$192.62
-5.09%
ENERGY · Cap: $53.44B
WDS
Woodside Energy Group Ltd
$21.33
-4.39%
ENERGY · Cap: $41.29B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Diamondback Energy Inc generates 11% more annual revenue ($14.46B vs $12.98B). WDS leads profitability with a 20.9% profit margin vs 2.0%. WDS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.33. WDS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).
FANG
Hold41
out of 100
Grade: D
WDS
Buy53
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+41.1%
Fair Value
$286.80
Current Price
$192.62
$94.18 discount
Margin of Safety
+25.4%
Fair Value
$25.14
Current Price
$21.33
$3.81 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
Large-cap with strong market position
Reasonable price relative to book value
Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Areas to Watch
4.2% revenue growth
ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency
2.0% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Weak financial health signals
Revenue declined 11.1%
Earnings declined 14.4%
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FANG
The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.
Bull Case : WDS
The strongest argument for WDS centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.9% and operating margin at 19.1%. PEG of 1.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : FANG
The primary concerns for FANG are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 191.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : WDS
The primary concerns for WDS are Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FANG profiles as a value stock while WDS is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.
FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.39 — expect wider price swings.
FANG is growing revenue faster at 4.2% — sustainability is the question.
FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
WDS scores higher overall (53/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 20.9% margins. FANG offers better value entry with a 41.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Diamondback Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.
Woodside Energy Group Ltd
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Woodside Energy Group Ltd is engaged in the exploration, evaluation, development, production, marketing and sale of hydrocarbons in Oceania, Asia, Canada, Africa and internationally. The company is headquartered in Perth, Australia.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?