Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsWoodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS)
FANG
Diamondback Energy Inc
$192.42
-2.30%
ENERGY · Cap: $57.40B
WDS
Woodside Energy Group Ltd
$23.17
-1.86%
ENERGY · Cap: $42.89B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Diamondback Energy Inc generates 17% more annual revenue ($16.25B vs $13.84B). WDS leads profitability with a 22.2% profit margin vs 9.0%. WDS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.33. WDS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 69/100 (B-).
FANG
Strong Buy69
out of 100
Grade: B-
WDS
Strong Buy69
out of 100
Grade: B-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+46.8%
Fair Value
$317.93
Current Price
$192.42
$125.51 discount
Margin of Safety
+29.5%
Fair Value
$26.58
Current Price
$23.17
$3.41 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 48.5%
Revenue surging 52.5% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 179.5% YoY
Large-cap with strong market position
Generating 2.6B in free cash flow
Reasonable price relative to book value
Keeps 22 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Strong operational efficiency at 23.9%
Earnings expanding 26.9% YoY
Areas to Watch
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
ROE of 4.2% — below average capital efficiency
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Weak financial health signals
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FANG
The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 52.5% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : WDS
The strongest argument for WDS centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 22.2% and operating margin at 23.9%. Revenue growth of 13.0% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : FANG
The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.
Bear Case : WDS
The primary concerns for WDS are Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FANG profiles as a hypergrowth stock while WDS is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.41 — expect wider price swings.
FANG is growing revenue faster at 52.5% — sustainability is the question.
FANG generates stronger free cash flow (2.6B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
FANG scores higher overall (69/100 vs 69/100) and 52.5% revenue growth. WDS offers better value entry with a 29.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Diamondback Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.
Woodside Energy Group Ltd
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Woodside Energy Group Ltd is engaged in the exploration, evaluation, development, production, marketing and sale of hydrocarbons in Oceania, Asia, Canada, Africa and internationally. The company is headquartered in Perth, Australia.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?