WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsGeoPark Ltd (GPRK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 2890% more annual revenue ($14.46B vs $483.54M). GPRK leads profitability with a 11.7% profit margin vs 2.0%. GPRK trades at a lower P/E of 10.0x. GPRK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.28

GPRK

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.5Value: 7.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.28
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+41.1%)

Margin of Safety

+41.1%

Fair Value

$286.80

Current Price

$192.62

$94.18 discount

UndervaluedFair: $286.80Overvalued
GPRKUndervalued (+23.9%)

Margin of Safety

+23.9%

Fair Value

$11.37

Current Price

$11.19

$0.18 discount

UndervaluedFair: $11.37Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$56.94B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

GPRK4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
45.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 45.2%

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
44.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 44.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

GPRK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$683.70M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.5%2/10

Revenue declined 6.5%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.282/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : GPRK

The strongest argument for GPRK centers on P/E Ratio, Operating Margin, Price/Book.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 208.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : GPRK

The primary concerns for GPRK are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.17 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a value stock while GPRK is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.44 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at 4.2% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GPRK scores higher overall (61/100 vs 41/100). FANG offers better value entry with a 41.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

GeoPark Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

GeoPark Limited is engaged in the exploration, development and production of oil and gas reserves in Chile, Colombia, Brazil, Argentina, Peru and Ecuador. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?