WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsGeoPark Ltd (GPRK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 2803% more annual revenue ($14.29B vs $492.50M). FANG leads profitability with a 11.6% profit margin vs 10.1%. GPRK trades at a lower P/E of 9.9x. GPRK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

GPRK

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 8.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.19
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
GPRKUndervalued (+80.8%)

Margin of Safety

+80.8%

Fair Value

$44.93

Current Price

$9.47

$35.46 discount

UndervaluedFair: $44.93Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

GPRK4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
103.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 103.5% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
22.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

GPRK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$493.17M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-23.3%2/10

Revenue declined 23.3%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.192/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : GPRK

The strongest argument for GPRK centers on P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : GPRK

The primary concerns for GPRK are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.86 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.57 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at -9.4% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

GPRK scores higher overall (57/100 vs 45/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

GeoPark Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

GeoPark Limited is engaged in the exploration, development and production of oil and gas reserves in Chile, Colombia, Brazil, Argentina, Peru and Ecuador. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?