Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsWoodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS)
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
$49.64
-1.94%
ENERGY · Cap: $103.22B
WDS
Woodside Energy Group Ltd
$23.17
-1.86%
ENERGY · Cap: $42.89B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 223% more annual revenue ($44.68B vs $13.84B). CNQ leads profitability with a 26.3% profit margin vs 22.2%. WDS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.33. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 79/100 (B+).
CNQ
Strong Buy79
out of 100
Grade: B+
WDS
Strong Buy69
out of 100
Grade: B-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+46.2%
Fair Value
$95.86
Current Price
$49.64
$46.22 discount
Margin of Safety
+29.5%
Fair Value
$26.58
Current Price
$23.17
$3.41 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Strong operational efficiency at 43.1%
Revenue surging 69.5% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 83.8% YoY
Large-cap with strong market position
Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit
Keeps 26 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Reasonable price relative to book value
Keeps 22 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Strong operational efficiency at 23.9%
Earnings expanding 26.9% YoY
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Weak financial health signals
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CNQ
The strongest argument for CNQ centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 26.3% and operating margin at 43.1%. Revenue growth of 69.5% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : WDS
The strongest argument for WDS centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 22.2% and operating margin at 23.9%. Revenue growth of 13.0% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : CNQ
The primary concerns for CNQ are PEG Ratio.
Bear Case : WDS
The primary concerns for WDS are Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CNQ profiles as a growth stock while WDS is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
CNQ carries more volatility with a beta of 0.88 — expect wider price swings.
CNQ is growing revenue faster at 69.5% — sustainability is the question.
CNQ generates stronger free cash flow (4.4B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
CNQ scores higher overall (79/100 vs 69/100), backed by strong 26.3% margins and 69.5% revenue growth. WDS offers better value entry with a 29.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
Woodside Energy Group Ltd
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Woodside Energy Group Ltd is engaged in the exploration, evaluation, development, production, marketing and sale of hydrocarbons in Oceania, Asia, Canada, Africa and internationally. The company is headquartered in Perth, Australia.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?