WallStSmart

Global Payments Inc (GPN)vsThomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares (TRI)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Global Payments Inc generates 16% more annual revenue ($8.86B vs $7.66B). TRI leads profitability with a 19.9% profit margin vs -8.0%. GPN appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.19. TRI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

GPN

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 3.5Value: 8.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.02

TRI

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.63
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

GPNUndervalued (+40.7%)

Margin of Safety

+40.7%

Fair Value

$121.85

Current Price

$66.32

$55.53 discount

UndervaluedFair: $121.85Overvalued
TRISignificantly Overvalued (-53.2%)

Margin of Safety

-53.2%

Fair Value

$58.22

Current Price

$86.04

$27.82 premium

UndervaluedFair: $58.22Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GPN3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1910/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
63.1%10/10

Revenue surging 63.1% year-over-year

TRI2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
30.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 30.3%

Debt/EquityHealth
0.219/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

GPN4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
-3.0%2/10

ROE of -3.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-59.2%2/10

Earnings declined 59.2%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-550.16M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.022/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

TRI0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GPN

The strongest argument for GPN centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 63.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.19 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TRI

The strongest argument for TRI centers on Operating Margin, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.9% and operating margin at 30.3%. PEG of 1.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : GPN

The primary concerns for GPN are Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : TRI

No major red flags identified for TRI, but monitor valuation.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GPN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while TRI is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

GPN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.77 — expect wider price swings.

GPN is growing revenue faster at 63.1% — sustainability is the question.

TRI generates stronger free cash flow (349M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GPN scores higher overall (59/100 vs 59/100) and 63.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Global Payments Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

Global Payments Inc. is an American company providing financial technology services globally headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.

Visit Website →

Thomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

Thomson Reuters Corporation provides business information services in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?