WallStSmart

Cintas Corporation (CTAS)vsGlobal Payments Inc (GPN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cintas Corporation generates 25% more annual revenue ($11.03B vs $8.86B). CTAS leads profitability with a 17.6% profit margin vs -8.0%. GPN appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.19. GPN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

CTAS

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 9.0Value: 2.7Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 4.29

GPN

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 3.5Value: 8.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.02
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CTASSignificantly Overvalued (-38.5%)

Margin of Safety

-38.5%

Fair Value

$144.61

Current Price

$179.85

$35.24 premium

UndervaluedFair: $144.61Overvalued
GPNUndervalued (+40.7%)

Margin of Safety

+40.7%

Fair Value

$121.85

Current Price

$66.32

$55.53 discount

UndervaluedFair: $121.85Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CTAS4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
40.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 40 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.2910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Market CapQuality
$69.92B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
23.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.2%

GPN3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1910/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
63.1%10/10

Revenue surging 63.1% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CTAS3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
36.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
15.0x4/10

Trading at 15.0x book value

PEG RatioValuation
2.802/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

GPN4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
-3.0%2/10

ROE of -3.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-59.2%2/10

Earnings declined 59.2%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-550.16M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.022/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CTAS

The strongest argument for CTAS centers on Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.6% and operating margin at 23.2%.

Bull Case : GPN

The strongest argument for GPN centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 63.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.19 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CTAS

The primary concerns for CTAS are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : GPN

The primary concerns for GPN are Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CTAS profiles as a mature stock while GPN is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CTAS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.93 — expect wider price swings.

GPN is growing revenue faster at 63.1% — sustainability is the question.

CTAS generates stronger free cash flow (531M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GPN scores higher overall (59/100 vs 58/100) and 63.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cintas Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses.

Global Payments Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

Global Payments Inc. is an American company providing financial technology services globally headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?