WallStSmart

Forestar Group Inc (FOR)vsSmith Douglas Homes Corp. (SDHC)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Forestar Group Inc generates 72% more annual revenue ($1.72B vs $1.00B). FOR leads profitability with a 9.9% profit margin vs 0.6%. FOR trades at a lower P/E of 7.7x. FOR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

FOR

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.99

SDHC

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 5.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 5.55
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FORUndervalued (+69.5%)

Margin of Safety

+69.5%

Fair Value

$96.88

Current Price

$25.92

$70.96 discount

UndervaluedFair: $96.88Overvalued
SDHCSignificantly Overvalued (-51.5%)

Margin of Safety

-51.5%

Fair Value

$11.90

Current Price

$10.52

$1.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $11.90Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FOR2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SDHC4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.5510/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

P/E RatioValuation
14.4x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Revenue GrowthGrowth
21.9%8/10

Revenue surging 21.9% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

FOR4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.994/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Market CapQuality
$1.31B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

SDHC4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$88.37M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.6%3/10

0.6% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FOR

The strongest argument for FOR centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : SDHC

The strongest argument for SDHC centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 21.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FOR

The primary concerns for FOR are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap.

Bear Case : SDHC

The primary concerns for SDHC are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 0.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FOR profiles as a value stock while SDHC is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

FOR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.40 — expect wider price swings.

SDHC is growing revenue faster at 21.9% — sustainability is the question.

FOR generates stronger free cash flow (32M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FOR scores higher overall (52/100 vs 46/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Forestar Group Inc

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Arlington, Texas.

Smith Douglas Homes Corp.

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

Smith Douglas Homes Corp. The company is headquartered in Woodstock, Georgia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?