WallStSmart

Forestar Group Inc (FOR)vsSmith Douglas Homes Corp. (SDHC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Forestar Group Inc generates 79% more annual revenue ($1.71B vs $952.84M). FOR leads profitability with a 9.8% profit margin vs 0.9%. FOR trades at a lower P/E of 8.6x. FOR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

FOR

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.99

SDHC

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.0Value: 6.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 5.55
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FORUndervalued (+69.9%)

Margin of Safety

+69.9%

Fair Value

$97.93

Current Price

$28.95

$68.99 discount

UndervaluedFair: $97.93Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SDHC.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FOR3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
22.3%8/10

Earnings expanding 22.3% YoY

SDHC3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.5510/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

P/E RatioValuation
16.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FOR4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.994/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Market CapQuality
$1.38B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
4.7%3/10

Operating margin of 4.7%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

SDHC4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$128.88M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.9%3/10

0.9% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
2.7%3/10

Operating margin of 2.7%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FOR

The strongest argument for FOR centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : SDHC

The strongest argument for SDHC centers on Altman Z-Score, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : FOR

The primary concerns for FOR are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : SDHC

The primary concerns for SDHC are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 0.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FOR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.39 — expect wider price swings.

FOR is growing revenue faster at -3.0% — sustainability is the question.

FOR generates stronger free cash flow (32M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FOR scores higher overall (51/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Forestar Group Inc

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Arlington, Texas.

Smith Douglas Homes Corp.

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

Smith Douglas Homes Corp. The company is headquartered in Woodstock, Georgia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?