WallStSmart

Forestar Group Inc (FOR)vsHoward Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Forestar Group Inc generates 14% more annual revenue ($1.69B vs $1.47B). FOR leads profitability with a 9.9% profit margin vs 8.4%. FOR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.90. FOR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

FOR

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

HHH

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 5.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.18
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FORSignificantly Overvalued (-32.7%)

Margin of Safety

-32.7%

Fair Value

$22.24

Current Price

$25.32

$3.08 premium

UndervaluedFair: $22.24Overvalued
HHHSignificantly Overvalued (-455.8%)

Margin of Safety

-455.8%

Fair Value

$15.03

Current Price

$63.87

$48.84 premium

UndervaluedFair: $15.03Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FOR2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.4x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

HHH1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FOR4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$1.24B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

PEG RatioValuation
4.902/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-6.3%2/10

Earnings declined 6.3%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-157.10M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

HHH4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.9x4/10

Moderate valuation

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Debt/EquityHealth
1.353/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FOR

The strongest argument for FOR centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : HHH

The strongest argument for HHH centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : FOR

The primary concerns for FOR are Market Cap, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : HHH

The primary concerns for HHH are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Debt/Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FOR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.41 — expect wider price swings.

FOR is growing revenue faster at 9.0% — sustainability is the question.

HHH generates stronger free cash flow (356M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FOR scores higher overall (48/100 vs 42/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Forestar Group Inc

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Arlington, Texas.

Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

The Howard Hughes Corporation owns, manages, and develops commercial, residential, and mixed-use properties in the United States. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?