WallStSmart

Forestar Group Inc (FOR)vsFive Point Holdings LLC (FPH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Forestar Group Inc generates 1447% more annual revenue ($1.71B vs $110.44M). FPH leads profitability with a 41.2% profit margin vs 9.8%. FPH trades at a lower P/E of 7.8x. FOR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

FOR

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.99

FPH

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.5Value: 7.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.13
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FORUndervalued (+70.3%)

Margin of Safety

+70.3%

Fair Value

$99.38

Current Price

$27.47

$71.91 discount

UndervaluedFair: $99.38Overvalued
FPHUndervalued (+6.0%)

Margin of Safety

+6.0%

Fair Value

$5.63

Current Price

$4.94

$0.69 discount

UndervaluedFair: $5.63Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FOR3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.4x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
22.3%8/10

Earnings expanding 22.3% YoY

FPH3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
41.2%10/10

Keeps 41 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

FOR4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.994/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Market CapQuality
$1.40B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
4.7%3/10

Operating margin of 4.7%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

FPH4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.2%4/10

3.2% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$706.98M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
5.4%3/10

ROE of 5.4% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FOR

The strongest argument for FOR centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : FPH

The strongest argument for FPH centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 41.2% and operating margin at -70.7%.

Bear Case : FOR

The primary concerns for FOR are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : FPH

The primary concerns for FPH are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FOR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.45 — expect wider price swings.

FPH is growing revenue faster at 3.2% — sustainability is the question.

FOR generates stronger free cash flow (152M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FOR scores higher overall (51/100 vs 42/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Forestar Group Inc

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Arlington, Texas.

Five Point Holdings LLC

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

Five Point Holdings, LLC, through its subsidiary, Five Point Operating Company, LP, designs and develops planned and mixed-use communities in Orange, Los Angeles and San Francisco counties. The company is headquartered in Irvine, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?