WallStSmart

Flowers Foods Inc (FLO)vsTarget Corporation (TGT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Target Corporation generates 1917% more annual revenue ($106.38B vs $5.27B). TGT leads profitability with a 3.2% profit margin vs 1.4%. TGT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.51. FLO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

FLO

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.89

TGT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 5.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FLOUndervalued (+65.4%)

Margin of Safety

+65.4%

Fair Value

$33.79

Current Price

$7.48

$26.31 discount

UndervaluedFair: $33.79Overvalued
TGTUndervalued (+4.0%)

Margin of Safety

+4.0%

Fair Value

$119.45

Current Price

$122.57

$3.12 discount

UndervaluedFair: $119.45Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FLO2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
20.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 20.0% YoY

TGT4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$60.48B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
21.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

Debt/EquityHealth
0.289/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
17.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

FLO4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.894/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Market CapQuality
$1.65B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
5.4%3/10

ROE of 5.4% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.4%3/10

1.4% margin — thin

TGT4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.2%3/10

3.2% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

Operating margin of 4.5%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FLO

The strongest argument for FLO centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : TGT

The strongest argument for TGT centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : FLO

The primary concerns for FLO are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 1.57 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 1.4% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : TGT

The primary concerns for TGT are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 3.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

TGT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.99 — expect wider price swings.

FLO is growing revenue faster at 6.8% — sustainability is the question.

FLO generates stronger free cash flow (87M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor PACKAGED FOODS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FLO scores higher overall (55/100 vs 52/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Flowers Foods Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · PACKAGED FOODS · USA

Flowers Foods, Inc. produces and markets packaged bakery products in the United States. The company is headquartered in Thomasville, Georgia.

Target Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · DISCOUNT STORES · USA

Target Corporation is an American retail corporation. Their retail formats include the discount store Target, the hypermarket SuperTarget, and small-format stores previously named CityTarget and TargetExpress before being consolidated under the Target branding.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?