WallStSmart

Flowers Foods Inc (FLO)vsGeneral Mills Inc (GIS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

General Mills Inc generates 249% more annual revenue ($18.37B vs $5.26B). GIS leads profitability with a 12.0% profit margin vs 1.6%. FLO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 6.10. FLO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

FLO

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0

GIS

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.99
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FLOUndervalued (+24.7%)

Margin of Safety

+24.7%

Fair Value

$15.52

Current Price

$8.28

$7.24 discount

UndervaluedFair: $15.52Overvalued
GISSignificantly Overvalued (-76.2%)

Margin of Safety

-76.2%

Fair Value

$27.81

Current Price

$36.17

$8.36 premium

UndervaluedFair: $27.81Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FLO2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
20.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 20.0% YoY

GIS3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
23.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FLO4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$1.73B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

1.6% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
6.102/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

GIS4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.994/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
11.742/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-8.4%2/10

Revenue declined 8.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FLO

The strongest argument for FLO centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : GIS

The strongest argument for GIS centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Price/Book.

Bear Case : FLO

The primary concerns for FLO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 1.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : GIS

The primary concerns for GIS are Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FLO profiles as a value stock while GIS is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

FLO carries more volatility with a beta of 0.32 — expect wider price swings.

FLO is growing revenue faster at 8.8% — sustainability is the question.

GIS generates stronger free cash flow (296M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FLO scores higher overall (55/100 vs 53/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Flowers Foods Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · PACKAGED FOODS · USA

Flowers Foods, Inc. produces and markets packaged bakery products in the United States. The company is headquartered in Thomasville, Georgia.

General Mills Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · PACKAGED FOODS · USA

General Mills, Inc., is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of branded consumer foods sold through retail stores. It is headquartered in Golden Valley, Minnesota, a suburb of Minneapolis.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?