WallStSmart

Flowers Foods Inc (FLO)vsGeneral Mills Inc (GIS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

General Mills Inc generates 248% more annual revenue ($18.37B vs $5.27B). GIS leads profitability with a 12.0% profit margin vs 1.4%. FLO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 6.10. GIS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

FLO

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.89

GIS

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 3.3Profit: 7.0Value: 5.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.99
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FLOUndervalued (+65.4%)

Margin of Safety

+65.4%

Fair Value

$33.79

Current Price

$7.48

$26.31 discount

UndervaluedFair: $33.79Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GIS.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FLO2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
20.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 20.0% YoY

GIS2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.4x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
23.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Areas to Watch

FLO4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.894/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Market CapQuality
$1.65B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
5.4%3/10

ROE of 5.4% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.4%3/10

1.4% margin — thin

GIS4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.2%4/10

2.2% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.994/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.493/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FLO

The strongest argument for FLO centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : GIS

The strongest argument for GIS centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : FLO

The primary concerns for FLO are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 1.57 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 1.4% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : GIS

The primary concerns for GIS are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FLO carries more volatility with a beta of 0.41 — expect wider price swings.

FLO is growing revenue faster at 6.8% — sustainability is the question.

GIS generates stronger free cash flow (296M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor PACKAGED FOODS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

GIS scores higher overall (59/100 vs 55/100). FLO offers better value entry with a 65.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Flowers Foods Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · PACKAGED FOODS · USA

Flowers Foods, Inc. produces and markets packaged bakery products in the United States. The company is headquartered in Thomasville, Georgia.

General Mills Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · PACKAGED FOODS · USA

General Mills, Inc., is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of branded consumer foods sold through retail stores. It is headquartered in Golden Valley, Minnesota, a suburb of Minneapolis.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?