WallStSmart

eHealth Inc (EHTH)vsMarsh & McLennan Companies Inc (MMC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc generates 4901% more annual revenue ($26.45B vs $528.91M). EHTH leads profitability with a 6.3% profit margin vs 0.2%. EHTH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.72. MMC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

EHTH

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 4.5Value: 6.0Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.90

MMC

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.67

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EHTH3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.149/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.728/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

MMC2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$89.82B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.30B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

EHTH4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$54.91M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
3.5%3/10

ROE of 3.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
6.3%3/10

6.3% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

Operating margin of 4.0%

MMC4 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.004/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.1%4/10

0.1% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.674/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EHTH

The strongest argument for EHTH centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.72 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : MMC

The strongest argument for MMC centers on Market Cap, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : EHTH

The primary concerns for EHTH are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : MMC

The primary concerns for MMC are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Thin 0.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EHTH carries more volatility with a beta of 1.48 — expect wider price swings.

MMC is growing revenue faster at 0.1% — sustainability is the question.

MMC generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor INSURANCE BROKERS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

MMC scores higher overall (62/100 vs 49/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

eHealth Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE BROKERS · USA

eHealth, Inc. provides private health insurance exchange services to individuals, families, and small businesses in the United States and China. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE BROKERS · USA

Marsh McLennan (formerly known as Marsh & McLennan Companies) is a global professional services firm, headquartered in New York City with businesses in insurance brokerage, risk management, reinsurance services, talent management, investment advisory, and management consulting. Its four main operating companies are Marsh, Guy Carpenter, Mercer, and Oliver Wyman.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?