WallStSmart

Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc (MMC)vsMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. generates 2% more annual revenue ($26.98B vs $26.45B). MMC leads profitability with a 15.6% profit margin vs 15.4%. MRSH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.71. MRSH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

MMC

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.67

MRSH

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MMCSignificantly Overvalued (-222.6%)

Margin of Safety

-222.6%

Fair Value

$56.64

Current Price

$182.70

$126.06 premium

UndervaluedFair: $56.64Overvalued
MRSHSignificantly Overvalued (-28.9%)

Margin of Safety

-28.9%

Fair Value

$134.21

Current Price

$173.10

$38.89 premium

UndervaluedFair: $134.21Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MMC3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$89.82B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
28.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.30B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

MRSH4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$85.18B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
29.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
25.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.4%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.06B8/10

Generating 2.1B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

MMC4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.004/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.674/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

MRSH1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.714/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MMC

The strongest argument for MMC centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Free Cash Flow. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.6% and operating margin at 19.2%. Revenue growth of 11.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MRSH

The strongest argument for MRSH centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.4% and operating margin at 25.4%.

Bear Case : MMC

The primary concerns for MMC are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : MRSH

The primary concerns for MRSH are PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MMC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.75 — expect wider price swings.

MMC is growing revenue faster at 11.5% — sustainability is the question.

MMC generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor INSURANCE BROKERS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

MRSH scores higher overall (64/100 vs 62/100), backed by strong 15.4% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE BROKERS · USA

Marsh McLennan (formerly known as Marsh & McLennan Companies) is a global professional services firm, headquartered in New York City with businesses in insurance brokerage, risk management, reinsurance services, talent management, investment advisory, and management consulting. Its four main operating companies are Marsh, Guy Carpenter, Mercer, and Oliver Wyman.

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE BROKERS · USA

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., a professional services company, provides advisory services and insurance solutions to clients in the areas of risk, strategy, and people globally. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?