WallStSmart

Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc (MMC)vsWillis Towers Watson PLC (WTW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc generates 162% more annual revenue ($26.45B vs $10.10B). WTW leads profitability with a 15.5% profit margin vs 0.2%. WTW appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.08. MMC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

MMC

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.67

WTW

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.5Value: 5.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.91

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MMC2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$89.82B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.30B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

WTW1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
20.9%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

Areas to Watch

MMC4 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.004/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.1%4/10

0.1% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.674/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

WTW3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-26.8%2/10

Earnings declined 26.8%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-65.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.912/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MMC

The strongest argument for MMC centers on Market Cap, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : WTW

The strongest argument for WTW centers on Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.5% and operating margin at 17.6%. PEG of 1.08 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : MMC

The primary concerns for MMC are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Thin 0.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WTW

The primary concerns for WTW are EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MMC profiles as a value stock while WTW is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

MMC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.75 — expect wider price swings.

WTW is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

MMC generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MMC scores higher overall (62/100 vs 60/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE BROKERS · USA

Marsh McLennan (formerly known as Marsh & McLennan Companies) is a global professional services firm, headquartered in New York City with businesses in insurance brokerage, risk management, reinsurance services, talent management, investment advisory, and management consulting. Its four main operating companies are Marsh, Guy Carpenter, Mercer, and Oliver Wyman.

Willis Towers Watson PLC

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE BROKERS · USA

Willis Towers Watson PLC (WTW) is a leading global advisory, broking, and solutions firm, dedicated to delivering innovative risk management, insurance, and consulting services across more than 140 countries. With a strong emphasis on advanced data analytics and technology, WTW provides tailored solutions to address critical issues in health, retirement, and talent management for a diverse client base, including multinational corporations and small businesses. The firm’s commitment to driving sustainable growth and enhancing client engagement positions it as a trusted partner in navigating complex market dynamics, further solidifying its status as an industry leader.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?