Brinker International Inc (EAT)vsYum! Brands Inc (YUM)
EAT
Brinker International Inc
$164.46
-0.26%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $6.83B
YUM
Yum! Brands Inc
$150.74
+1.88%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $42.53B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Yum! Brands Inc generates 48% more annual revenue ($8.49B vs $5.73B). YUM leads profitability with a 20.5% profit margin vs 8.1%. EAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.89. YUM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).
EAT
Buy61
out of 100
Grade: C+
YUM
Buy65
out of 100
Grade: C+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for EAT.
Margin of Safety
-88.1%
Fair Value
$84.55
Current Price
$150.74
$66.19 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Every $100 of equity generates 114 in profit
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Strong operational efficiency at 31.1%
Earnings expanding 72.2% YoY
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit
15.2% revenue growth
Areas to Watch
Trading at 17.4x book value
3.2% revenue growth
Elevated debt levels
Expensive relative to growth rate
ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency
Weak financial health signals
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : EAT
The strongest argument for EAT centers on Return on Equity, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. PEG of 0.89 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : YUM
The strongest argument for YUM centers on Operating Margin, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.5% and operating margin at 31.1%. Revenue growth of 15.2% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : EAT
The primary concerns for EAT are Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 4.31 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Bear Case : YUM
The primary concerns for YUM are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
EAT profiles as a value stock while YUM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.
EAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.28 — expect wider price swings.
YUM is growing revenue faster at 15.2% — sustainability is the question.
YUM generates stronger free cash flow (341M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
YUM scores higher overall (65/100 vs 61/100), backed by strong 20.5% margins and 15.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Brinker International Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA
Brinker International, Inc. owns, develops, operates and franchises casual dining restaurants in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
Visit Website →Yum! Brands Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA
Yum! Brands, Inc. is an American fast food corporation listed on the Fortune 1000. Yum! operates the brands KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, The Habit Burger Grill, and WingStreet worldwide, except in China, where the brands are operated by a separate company, Yum China.
Compare with Other RESTAURANTS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?