WallStSmart

Brinker International Inc (EAT)vsRestaurant Brands International Inc (QSR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc generates 67% more annual revenue ($9.59B vs $5.73B). QSR leads profitability with a 10.0% profit margin vs 8.1%. EAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.89. QSR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

EAT

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.5Value: 7.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.63

QSR

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 8.0Value: 6.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.90
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for EAT.

QSRUndervalued (+25.3%)

Margin of Safety

+25.3%

Fair Value

$94.60

Current Price

$72.66

$21.94 discount

UndervaluedFair: $94.60Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EAT3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Return on EquityProfitability
114.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 114 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.898/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
15.5x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

QSR3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
100.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 100.0% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
25.5%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
25.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.9%

Areas to Watch

EAT3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Price/BookValuation
17.4x4/10

Trading at 17.4x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.2%4/10

3.2% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
4.311/10

Elevated debt levels

QSR2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.902/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
4.191/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EAT

The strongest argument for EAT centers on Return on Equity, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. PEG of 0.89 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : QSR

The strongest argument for QSR centers on EPS Growth, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.28 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : EAT

The primary concerns for EAT are Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 4.31 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : QSR

The primary concerns for QSR are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 4.19 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.28 — expect wider price swings.

QSR is growing revenue faster at 7.3% — sustainability is the question.

EAT generates stronger free cash flow (181M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor RESTAURANTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

QSR scores higher overall (68/100 vs 61/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Brinker International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Brinker International, Inc. owns, develops, operates and franchises casual dining restaurants in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Visit Website →

Restaurant Brands International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK) and Popeyes (PLK) brands. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?