WallStSmart

Brinker International Inc (EAT)vsRestaurant Brands International Inc (QSR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc generates 67% more annual revenue ($9.70B vs $5.81B). QSR leads profitability with a 13.1% profit margin vs 8.4%. QSR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.88. QSR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B).

EAT

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 5.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 3.08

QSR

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.0Value: 7.3Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.90
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for EAT.

QSRUndervalued (+25.0%)

Margin of Safety

+25.0%

Fair Value

$94.22

Current Price

$72.56

$21.66 discount

UndervaluedFair: $94.22Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EAT3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
114.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 114 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.0810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

EPS GrowthGrowth
29.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 29.4% YoY

QSR4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
33.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 33 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
151.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 151.2% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
0.888/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
27.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.7%

Areas to Watch

EAT3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.634/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
19.1x4/10

Trading at 19.1x book value

Debt/EquityHealth
3.961/10

Elevated debt levels

QSR3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.6%4/10

4.6% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.902/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
4.071/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EAT

The strongest argument for EAT centers on Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : QSR

The strongest argument for QSR centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.88 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : EAT

The primary concerns for EAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 3.96 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : QSR

The primary concerns for QSR are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 4.07 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.

EAT is growing revenue faster at 5.1% — sustainability is the question.

QSR generates stronger free cash flow (479M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor RESTAURANTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

QSR scores higher overall (70/100 vs 61/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Brinker International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Brinker International, Inc. owns, develops, operates and franchises casual dining restaurants in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Visit Website →

Restaurant Brands International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK) and Popeyes (PLK) brands. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?