WallStSmart

Brinker International Inc (EAT)vsMcDonald’s Corporation (MCD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

McDonald’s Corporation generates 383% more annual revenue ($27.70B vs $5.73B). MCD leads profitability with a 31.7% profit margin vs 8.1%. EAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.56. EAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

EAT

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.5Value: 5.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.63

MCD

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.0Value: 3.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.79
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for EAT.

MCDSignificantly Overvalued (-78.2%)

Margin of Safety

-78.2%

Fair Value

$153.73

Current Price

$276.26

$122.53 premium

UndervaluedFair: $153.73Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EAT1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
114.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 114 in profit

MCD5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
Profit MarginProfitability
31.7%10/10

Keeps 32 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
47.0%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 47.0%

Debt/EquityHealth
-42.6810/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$192.31B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.73B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

EAT4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.564/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.2%4/10

3.2% revenue growth

Price/BookValuation
23.8x2/10

Trading at 23.8x book value

Debt/EquityHealth
4.311/10

Elevated debt levels

MCD4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.8%4/10

3.8% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.582/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EAT

The strongest argument for EAT centers on Return on Equity.

Bull Case : MCD

The strongest argument for MCD centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 31.7% and operating margin at 47.0%.

Bear Case : EAT

The primary concerns for EAT are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Debt-to-equity of 4.31 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : MCD

The primary concerns for MCD are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

MCD is growing revenue faster at 3.8% — sustainability is the question.

MCD generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor RESTAURANTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

EAT scores higher overall (57/100 vs 53/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Brinker International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Brinker International, Inc. owns, develops, operates and franchises casual dining restaurants in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Visit Website →

McDonald’s Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

McDonald's Corporation is an American fast food company, founded in 1940 as a restaurant operated by Richard and Maurice McDonald, in San Bernardino, California, United States. They rechristened their business as a hamburger stand, and later turned the company into a franchise, with the Golden Arches logo being introduced in 1953 at a location in Phoenix, Arizona.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?