WallStSmart

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsPACCAR Inc (PCAR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 40% more annual revenue ($38.76B vs $27.78B). CNQ leads profitability with a 27.9% profit margin vs 8.9%. PCAR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.19. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CNQ

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

PCAR

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 1/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CNQUndervalued (+55.1%)

Margin of Safety

+55.1%

Fair Value

$90.53

Current Price

$44.53

$46.00 discount

UndervaluedFair: $90.53Overvalued
PCARSignificantly Overvalued (-24.5%)

Margin of Safety

-24.5%

Fair Value

$103.99

Current Price

$114.31

$10.32 premium

UndervaluedFair: $103.99Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNQ6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
371.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 371.8% YoY

Market CapQuality
$92.88B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
27.9%9/10

Keeps 28 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PCAR1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$60.02B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

CNQ2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.5%4/10

1.5% revenue growth

PEG RatioValuation
3.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

PCAR2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-8.9%2/10

Revenue declined 8.9%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNQ

The strongest argument for CNQ centers on P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.9% and operating margin at 19.6%.

Bull Case : PCAR

The strongest argument for PCAR centers on Market Cap. PEG of 1.19 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CNQ

The primary concerns for CNQ are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : PCAR

The primary concerns for PCAR are Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PCAR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.03 — expect wider price swings.

CNQ is growing revenue faster at 1.5% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CNQ scores higher overall (67/100 vs 54/100), backed by strong 27.9% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

PACCAR Inc

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

PACCAR Inc is an American Fortune 500 company and counts among the largest manufacturers of medium- and heavy-duty trucks in the world. PACCAR is engaged in the design, manufacture and customer support of light-, medium- and heavy-duty trucks under the Kenworth, Peterbilt, Leyland Trucks, and DAF nameplates. PACCAR also designs and manufactures powertrains, provides financial services and information technology, and distributes truck parts related to its principal business.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?