Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsDiamondback Energy Inc (FANG)
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
$49.64
-1.94%
ENERGY · Cap: $103.22B
FANG
Diamondback Energy Inc
$192.42
-2.30%
ENERGY · Cap: $57.40B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 175% more annual revenue ($44.68B vs $16.25B). CNQ leads profitability with a 26.3% profit margin vs 9.0%. CNQ appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.42. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 79/100 (B+).
CNQ
Strong Buy79
out of 100
Grade: B+
FANG
Strong Buy69
out of 100
Grade: B-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+46.2%
Fair Value
$95.86
Current Price
$49.64
$46.22 discount
Margin of Safety
+46.8%
Fair Value
$317.93
Current Price
$192.42
$125.51 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Strong operational efficiency at 43.1%
Revenue surging 69.5% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 83.8% YoY
Large-cap with strong market position
Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit
Keeps 26 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 48.5%
Revenue surging 52.5% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 179.5% YoY
Large-cap with strong market position
Generating 2.6B in free cash flow
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
ROE of 4.2% — below average capital efficiency
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CNQ
The strongest argument for CNQ centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 26.3% and operating margin at 43.1%. Revenue growth of 69.5% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : FANG
The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 52.5% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : CNQ
The primary concerns for CNQ are PEG Ratio.
Bear Case : FANG
The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CNQ profiles as a growth stock while FANG is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.
CNQ carries more volatility with a beta of 0.88 — expect wider price swings.
CNQ is growing revenue faster at 69.5% — sustainability is the question.
CNQ generates stronger free cash flow (4.4B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
CNQ scores higher overall (79/100 vs 69/100), backed by strong 26.3% margins and 69.5% revenue growth. FANG offers better value entry with a 46.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
Diamondback Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?