WallStSmart

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsConocoPhillips (COP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 44% more annual revenue ($64.46B vs $44.68B). CNQ leads profitability with a 26.3% profit margin vs 14.4%. COP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.24. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 79/100 (B+).

CNQ

Strong Buy

79

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 9.0Value: 6.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.05

COP

Strong Buy

78

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.0Value: 5.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.36
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CNQUndervalued (+46.2%)

Margin of Safety

+46.2%

Fair Value

$95.86

Current Price

$49.64

$46.22 discount

UndervaluedFair: $95.86Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for COP.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNQ6 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
43.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 43.1%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.5%10/10

Revenue surging 69.5% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
83.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 83.8% YoY

Market CapQuality
$103.22B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
26.3%9/10

Keeps 26 of every $100 in revenue as profit

COP6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Operating MarginProfitability
31.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 31.5%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
35.5%10/10

Revenue surging 35.5% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
107.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 107.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$165.00B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.41B8/10

Generating 4.4B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CNQ1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

COP0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNQ

The strongest argument for CNQ centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 26.3% and operating margin at 43.1%. Revenue growth of 69.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 35.5% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.24 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CNQ

The primary concerns for CNQ are PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : COP

No major red flags identified for COP, but monitor valuation.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNQ carries more volatility with a beta of 0.88 — expect wider price swings.

CNQ is growing revenue faster at 69.5% — sustainability is the question.

CNQ generates stronger free cash flow (4.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CNQ scores higher overall (79/100 vs 78/100), backed by strong 26.3% margins and 69.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?