WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsPACCAR Inc (PCAR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

PACCAR Inc generates 99% more annual revenue ($28.44B vs $14.29B). FANG leads profitability with a 11.6% profit margin vs 8.3%. PCAR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.11. PCAR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 46/100 (D+).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

PCAR

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 1/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
PCARSignificantly Overvalued (-321.2%)

Margin of Safety

-321.2%

Fair Value

$30.74

Current Price

$116.34

$85.60 premium

UndervaluedFair: $30.74Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

PCAR1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$60.90B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

PCAR4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.6x4/10

Moderate valuation

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-13.7%2/10

Revenue declined 13.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-35.9%2/10

Earnings declined 35.9%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : PCAR

The strongest argument for PCAR centers on Market Cap. PEG of 1.11 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : PCAR

The primary concerns for PCAR are P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while PCAR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

PCAR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.05 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at -9.4% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PCAR scores higher overall (46/100 vs 45/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

PACCAR Inc

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

PACCAR Inc is an American Fortune 500 company and counts among the largest manufacturers of medium- and heavy-duty trucks in the world. PACCAR is engaged in the design, manufacture and customer support of light-, medium- and heavy-duty trucks under the Kenworth, Peterbilt, Leyland Trucks, and DAF nameplates. PACCAR also designs and manufactures powertrains, provides financial services and information technology, and distributes truck parts related to its principal business.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?