Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsMesa Royalty Trust (MTR)
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
$49.02
+1.32%
ENERGY · Cap: $102.25B
MTR
Mesa Royalty Trust
$5.13
-2.56%
ENERGY · Cap: $9.69M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 6218835% more annual revenue ($38.76B vs $623,290). MTR leads profitability with a 68.7% profit margin vs 27.9%. CNQ trades at a lower P/E of 13.0x. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).
CNQ
Strong Buy67
out of 100
Grade: B-
MTR
Buy58
out of 100
Grade: C
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+76.9%
Fair Value
$175.97
Current Price
$49.02
$126.95 discount
Margin of Safety
+55.5%
Fair Value
$10.76
Current Price
$5.13
$5.63 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Large-cap with strong market position
Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit
Keeps 28 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Generating 2.3B in free cash flow
Keeps 69 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 59.2%
Revenue surging 40.1% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 61.8% YoY
Areas to Watch
1.5% revenue growth
3.7% earnings growth
Expensive relative to growth rate
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CNQ
The strongest argument for CNQ centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.9% and operating margin at 19.6%.
Bull Case : MTR
The strongest argument for MTR centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 68.7% and operating margin at 59.2%. Revenue growth of 40.1% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : CNQ
The primary concerns for CNQ are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, PEG Ratio.
Bear Case : MTR
The primary concerns for MTR are Market Cap.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CNQ profiles as a value stock while MTR is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.
CNQ carries more volatility with a beta of 1.06 — expect wider price swings.
MTR is growing revenue faster at 40.1% — sustainability is the question.
CNQ generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
CNQ scores higher overall (67/100 vs 58/100), backed by strong 27.9% margins. MTR offers better value entry with a 55.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
Mesa Royalty Trust
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Mesa Royalty Trust owns net royalty interests in various oil and gas producing properties in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?