WallStSmart

ConocoPhillips (COP)vsMesa Royalty Trust (MTR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 9550962% more annual revenue ($59.38B vs $621,690). MTR leads profitability with a 69.3% profit margin vs 12.3%. MTR trades at a lower P/E of 12.6x. COP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

COP

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.5Value: 5.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.36

MTR

Hold

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 7.5Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for COP.

MTRSignificantly Overvalued (-60.2%)

Margin of Safety

-60.2%

Fair Value

$2.99

Current Price

$2.86

$0.13 premium

UndervaluedFair: $2.99Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

COP4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$143.69B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
22.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.76B8/10

Generating 5.8B in free cash flow

MTR3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Profit MarginProfitability
69.3%10/10

Keeps 69 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
12.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

COP2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.3%2/10

Revenue declined 5.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-20.2%2/10

Earnings declined 20.2%

MTR4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$5.39M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
0.9%3/10

Operating margin of 0.9%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-46.7%2/10

Revenue declined 46.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-99.3%2/10

Earnings declined 99.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.02 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : MTR

The strongest argument for MTR centers on Profit Margin, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 69.3% and operating margin at 0.9%.

Bear Case : COP

The primary concerns for COP are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : MTR

The primary concerns for MTR are Market Cap, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MTR carries more volatility with a beta of 0.43 — expect wider price swings.

COP is growing revenue faster at -5.3% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

COP scores higher overall (56/100 vs 35/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

Mesa Royalty Trust

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Mesa Royalty Trust owns net royalty interests in various oil and gas producing properties in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?