WallStSmart

ConocoPhillips (COP)vsMesa Royalty Trust (MTR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 8696915% more annual revenue ($59.38B vs $682,740). MTR leads profitability with a 74.8% profit margin vs 12.3%. MTR trades at a lower P/E of 16.7x. MTR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

COP

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.5Value: 5.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.36

MTR

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 9.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

COPSignificantly Overvalued (-83.1%)

Margin of Safety

-83.1%

Fair Value

$58.83

Current Price

$119.27

$60.44 premium

UndervaluedFair: $58.83Overvalued
MTRSignificantly Overvalued (-76.8%)

Margin of Safety

-76.8%

Fair Value

$2.71

Current Price

$3.81

$1.10 premium

UndervaluedFair: $2.71Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

COP5 strengths · Avg: 8.2/10
Market CapQuality
$136.77B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.998/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
22.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.35B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

MTR6 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
74.8%10/10

Keeps 75 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
90.4%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 90.4%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
58.8%10/10

Revenue surging 58.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
132.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 132.9% YoY

P/E RatioValuation
16.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

COP2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.3%2/10

Revenue declined 5.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-20.2%2/10

Earnings declined 20.2%

MTR1 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$7.17M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.99 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : MTR

The strongest argument for MTR centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 74.8% and operating margin at 90.4%. Revenue growth of 58.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : COP

The primary concerns for COP are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : MTR

The primary concerns for MTR are Market Cap.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

COP profiles as a declining stock while MTR is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

MTR carries more volatility with a beta of 0.49 — expect wider price swings.

MTR is growing revenue faster at 58.8% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

MTR scores higher overall (64/100 vs 58/100), backed by strong 74.8% margins and 58.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

Mesa Royalty Trust

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Mesa Royalty Trust owns net royalty interests in various oil and gas producing properties in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?