EQT Corporation (EQT)vsDiamondback Energy Inc (FANG)
EQT
EQT Corporation
$58.66
-2.36%
ENERGY · Cap: $36.69B
FANG
Diamondback Energy Inc
$207.65
+0.98%
ENERGY · Cap: $57.85B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Diamondback Energy Inc generates 53% more annual revenue ($14.29B vs $9.36B). EQT leads profitability with a 35.1% profit margin vs 11.6%. EQT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.66. EQT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 81/100 (A-).
EQT
Exceptional Buy81
out of 100
Grade: A-
FANG
Hold43
out of 100
Grade: D
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+13.5%
Fair Value
$65.79
Current Price
$58.66
$7.13 discount
Margin of Safety
+44.1%
Fair Value
$302.54
Current Price
$207.65
$94.89 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Keeps 35 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 57.4%
Revenue surging 49.9% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 490.0% YoY
Reasonable price relative to book value
Large-cap with strong market position
Reasonable price relative to book value
Generating 1.4B in free cash flow
Areas to Watch
Distress zone — elevated risk
Expensive relative to growth rate
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : EQT
The strongest argument for EQT centers on P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 35.1% and operating margin at 57.4%. Revenue growth of 49.9% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : FANG
The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.
Bear Case : EQT
The primary concerns for EQT are Altman Z-Score, PEG Ratio.
Bear Case : FANG
The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
EQT profiles as a growth stock while FANG is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.
EQT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.69 — expect wider price swings.
EQT is growing revenue faster at 49.9% — sustainability is the question.
EQT generates stronger free cash flow (2.5B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
EQT scores higher overall (81/100 vs 43/100), backed by strong 35.1% margins and 49.9% revenue growth. FANG offers better value entry with a 44.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
EQT Corporation
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
EQT Corporation is a natural gas production company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Visit Website →Diamondback Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?