WallStSmart

EQT Corporation (EQT)vsDiamondback Energy Inc (FANG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 75% more annual revenue ($14.29B vs $8.18B). EQT leads profitability with a 24.9% profit margin vs 11.6%. EQT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 7.13. EQT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

EQT

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.5Value: 7.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.50

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EQTUndervalued (+63.3%)

Margin of Safety

+63.3%

Fair Value

$154.91

Current Price

$64.67

$90.24 discount

UndervaluedFair: $154.91Overvalued
FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$192.54

$61.90 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EQT5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
55.0%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 55.0%

EPS GrowthGrowth
54.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 54.6% YoY

Profit MarginProfitability
24.9%9/10

Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
26.9%8/10

Revenue surging 26.9% year-over-year

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$51.88B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

EQT2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.504/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

PEG RatioValuation
7.132/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
31.8x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
106.322/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EQT

The strongest argument for EQT centers on Operating Margin, EPS Growth, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 24.9% and operating margin at 55.0%. Revenue growth of 26.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : EQT

The primary concerns for EQT are Altman Z-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EQT profiles as a growth stock while FANG is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

EQT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.72 — expect wider price swings.

EQT is growing revenue faster at 26.9% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

EQT scores higher overall (72/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 24.9% margins and 26.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

EQT Corporation

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

EQT Corporation is a natural gas production company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Visit Website →

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?