WallStSmart

The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. (BWIN)vsMarsh & McLennan Companies Inc (MMC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc generates 1658% more annual revenue ($26.45B vs $1.50B). MMC leads profitability with a 15.6% profit margin vs -2.3%. MMC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

BWIN

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.5Value: 5.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.64

MMC

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.67
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BWIN.

MMCSignificantly Overvalued (-222.6%)

Margin of Safety

-222.6%

Fair Value

$56.64

Current Price

$182.70

$126.06 premium

UndervaluedFair: $56.64Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BWIN1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MMC3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$89.82B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
28.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.30B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

BWIN4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.2%2/10

ROE of -5.2% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-39.4%2/10

Earnings declined 39.4%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-84,0002/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

MMC4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.004/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.674/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BWIN

The strongest argument for BWIN centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : MMC

The strongest argument for MMC centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Free Cash Flow. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.6% and operating margin at 19.2%. Revenue growth of 11.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : BWIN

The primary concerns for BWIN are Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.78 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : MMC

The primary concerns for MMC are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BWIN profiles as a turnaround stock while MMC is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

BWIN carries more volatility with a beta of 1.31 — expect wider price swings.

MMC is growing revenue faster at 11.5% — sustainability is the question.

MMC generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MMC scores higher overall (62/100 vs 32/100), backed by strong 15.6% margins and 11.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE BROKERS · USA

The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is an independent insurance distribution firm that delivers insurance and risk management solutions in the United States. The company is headquartered in Tampa, Florida.

Visit Website →

Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE BROKERS · USA

Marsh McLennan (formerly known as Marsh & McLennan Companies) is a global professional services firm, headquartered in New York City with businesses in insurance brokerage, risk management, reinsurance services, talent management, investment advisory, and management consulting. Its four main operating companies are Marsh, Guy Carpenter, Mercer, and Oliver Wyman.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?