SM Energy Co (SM)vsWoodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS)
SM
SM Energy Co
$31.50
+3.79%
ENERGY · Cap: $7.51B
WDS
Woodside Energy Group Ltd
$23.66
-2.79%
ENERGY · Cap: $46.27B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Woodside Energy Group Ltd generates 329% more annual revenue ($12.98B vs $3.03B). SM leads profitability with a 21.4% profit margin vs 20.9%. WDS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.33. WDS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).
SM
Buy52
out of 100
Grade: C-
WDS
Buy53
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+42.9%
Fair Value
$38.35
Current Price
$31.50
$6.85 discount
Margin of Safety
-94.1%
Fair Value
$9.66
Current Price
$23.66
$14.00 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 26.9%
Reasonable price relative to book value
Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Revenue declined 17.1%
Earnings declined 42.3%
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency
Weak financial health signals
Revenue declined 11.1%
Earnings declined 14.4%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : SM
The strongest argument for SM centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 21.4% and operating margin at 26.9%.
Bull Case : WDS
The strongest argument for WDS centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.9% and operating margin at 19.1%. PEG of 1.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : SM
The primary concerns for SM are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.
Bear Case : WDS
The primary concerns for WDS are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
SM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.99 — expect wider price swings.
WDS is growing revenue faster at -11.1% — sustainability is the question.
WDS generates stronger free cash flow (417M), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
WDS scores higher overall (53/100 vs 52/100), backed by strong 20.9% margins. SM offers better value entry with a 42.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
SM Energy Co
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
SM Energy Company, an independent energy company, is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids in the state of Texas. The company is headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
Woodside Energy Group Ltd
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Woodside Energy Group Ltd is engaged in the exploration, evaluation, development, production, marketing and sale of hydrocarbons in Oceania, Asia, Canada, Africa and internationally. The company is headquartered in Perth, Australia.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?