ConocoPhillips (COP)vsSM Energy Co (SM)
COP
ConocoPhillips
$128.93
-0.32%
ENERGY · Cap: $157.60B
SM
SM Energy Co
$31.50
+3.79%
ENERGY · Cap: $7.51B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
ConocoPhillips generates 1891% more annual revenue ($60.28B vs $3.03B). SM leads profitability with a 21.4% profit margin vs 13.3%. COP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.22. SM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).
COP
Hold48
out of 100
Grade: D+
SM
Buy52
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-157.1%
Fair Value
$43.25
Current Price
$128.93
$85.68 premium
Margin of Safety
+42.9%
Fair Value
$38.35
Current Price
$31.50
$6.85 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Large-cap with strong market position
Reasonable price relative to book value
Generating 1.3B in free cash flow
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 26.9%
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Revenue declined 6.8%
Earnings declined 39.0%
Expensive relative to growth rate
Revenue declined 17.1%
Earnings declined 42.3%
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : COP
The strongest argument for COP centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.
Bull Case : SM
The strongest argument for SM centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 21.4% and operating margin at 26.9%.
Bear Case : COP
The primary concerns for COP are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.
Bear Case : SM
The primary concerns for SM are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
SM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.99 — expect wider price swings.
COP is growing revenue faster at -6.8% — sustainability is the question.
COP generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
SM scores higher overall (52/100 vs 48/100), backed by strong 21.4% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
ConocoPhillips
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.
SM Energy Co
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
SM Energy Company, an independent energy company, is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids in the state of Texas. The company is headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?