ConocoPhillips (COP)vsSM Energy Co (SM)
COP
ConocoPhillips
$119.27
+1.40%
ENERGY · Cap: $142.38B
SM
SM Energy Co
$33.95
-0.42%
ENERGY · Cap: $7.36B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
ConocoPhillips generates 1542% more annual revenue ($59.38B vs $3.62B). COP leads profitability with a 12.3% profit margin vs 3.6%. SM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.54. COP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).
COP
Buy58
out of 100
Grade: C
SM
Buy53
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for COP.
Margin of Safety
+61.7%
Fair Value
$84.07
Current Price
$33.95
$50.12 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Large-cap with strong market position
Growing faster than its price suggests
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 22.1%
Generating 1.3B in free cash flow
Reasonable price relative to book value
Revenue surging 73.0% year-over-year
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Areas to Watch
Revenue declined 5.3%
Earnings declined 20.2%
Grey zone — moderate risk
ROE of 2.3% — below average capital efficiency
3.6% margin — thin
Earnings declined 42.3%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : COP
The strongest argument for COP centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.98 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : SM
The strongest argument for SM centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 73.0% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.54 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : COP
The primary concerns for COP are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.
Bear Case : SM
The primary concerns for SM are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
COP profiles as a declining stock while SM is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.
SM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.74 — expect wider price swings.
SM is growing revenue faster at 73.0% — sustainability is the question.
COP generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
COP scores higher overall (58/100 vs 53/100). SM offers better value entry with a 61.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
ConocoPhillips
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.
SM Energy Co
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
SM Energy Company, an independent energy company, is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids in the state of Texas. The company is headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?