WallStSmart

Nio Inc Class A ADR (NIO)vsToyota Motor Corporation ADR (TM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Toyota Motor Corporation ADR generates 45431% more annual revenue ($51.96T vs $114.11B). TM leads profitability with a 8.6% profit margin vs -4.2%. TM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

NIO

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: -1.07

TM

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.5Value: 6.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.64
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

NIOUndervalued (+88.3%)

Margin of Safety

+88.3%

Fair Value

$43.39

Current Price

$3.69

$39.70 discount

UndervaluedFair: $43.39Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NIO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.1%10/10

Revenue surging 69.1% year-over-year

TM3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$233.41B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

P/E RatioValuation
8.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
86.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 86.9% YoY

Areas to Watch

NIO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Price/BookValuation
14.8x4/10

Trading at 14.8x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Return on EquityProfitability
-207.8%2/10

ROE of -207.8% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-1.072/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

TM4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.564/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
16.1x4/10

Trading at 16.1x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.644/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.183/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NIO

The strongest argument for NIO centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 69.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TM

The strongest argument for TM centers on Market Cap, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 10.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : NIO

The primary concerns for NIO are Price/Book, EPS Growth, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 7.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TM

The primary concerns for TM are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NIO profiles as a hypergrowth stock while TM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

NIO carries more volatility with a beta of 0.92 — expect wider price swings.

NIO is growing revenue faster at 69.1% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor AUTO MANUFACTURERS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

TM scores higher overall (65/100 vs 34/100) and 10.4% revenue growth. NIO offers better value entry with a 88.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Nio Inc Class A ADR

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO MANUFACTURERS · China

NIO Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells smart electric vehicles in mainland China, Hong Kong, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany. The company is headquartered in Shanghai, China.

Visit Website →

Toyota Motor Corporation ADR

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO MANUFACTURERS · USA

Toyota Motor Corporation designs, manufactures, assembles and sells passenger cars, minivans and commercial vehicles, and related parts and accessories. The company is headquartered in Toyota, Japan.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?