WallStSmart

Ford Motor Company (F)vsToyota Motor Corporation ADR (TM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Toyota Motor Corporation ADR generates 26596% more annual revenue ($50.68T vs $189.86B). TM leads profitability with a 7.6% profit margin vs -3.2%. TM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.54. TM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

F

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 3.5Value: 3.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.91

TM

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 6.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.63
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FSignificantly Overvalued (-15.7%)

Margin of Safety

-15.7%

Fair Value

$12.21

Current Price

$14.90

$2.69 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.21Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

F3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
430.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 430.8% YoY

Market CapQuality
$58.85B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TM4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Market CapQuality
$228.02B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

P/E RatioValuation
9.5x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$398.23B10/10

Generating 398.2B in free cash flow

EPS GrowthGrowth
23.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 23.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

F4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
8.482/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-16.3%2/10

ROE of -16.3% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.06B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

TM4 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.544/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
15.1x4/10

Trading at 15.1x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.9%4/10

1.9% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.634/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : F

The strongest argument for F centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Price/Book.

Bull Case : TM

The strongest argument for TM centers on Market Cap, P/E Ratio, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : F

The primary concerns for F are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 4.20 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TM

The primary concerns for TM are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

F profiles as a turnaround stock while TM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

F carries more volatility with a beta of 1.80 — expect wider price swings.

F is growing revenue faster at 6.4% — sustainability is the question.

TM generates stronger free cash flow (398.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TM scores higher overall (60/100 vs 53/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ford Motor Company

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO MANUFACTURERS · USA

Ford Motor Company, commonly known as Ford, is an American multinational automaker that has its main headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan.

Visit Website →

Toyota Motor Corporation ADR

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO MANUFACTURERS · USA

Toyota Motor Corporation designs, manufactures, assembles and sells passenger cars, minivans and commercial vehicles, and related parts and accessories. The company is headquartered in Toyota, Japan.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?