WallStSmart

Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR)vsWoodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Woodside Energy Group Ltd generates 1142% more annual revenue ($12.98B vs $1.05B). WDS leads profitability with a 20.9% profit margin vs 13.7%. MNR trades at a lower P/E of 12.8x. MNR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

MNR

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.0Value: 8.3Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 3/9

WDS

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.37
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MNRUndervalued (+72.3%)

Margin of Safety

+72.3%

Fair Value

$47.00

Current Price

$14.01

$32.99 discount

UndervaluedFair: $47.00Overvalued
WDSSignificantly Overvalued (-94.1%)

Margin of Safety

-94.1%

Fair Value

$9.66

Current Price

$23.66

$14.00 premium

UndervaluedFair: $9.66Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MNR5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
30.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 30.6%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
36.8%10/10

Revenue surging 36.8% year-over-year

P/E RatioValuation
12.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
22.7%8/10

Earnings expanding 22.7% YoY

WDS3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
20.9%9/10

Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
17.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

MNR2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-57.23M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

WDS4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.1%2/10

Revenue declined 11.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-14.4%2/10

Earnings declined 14.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MNR

The strongest argument for MNR centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 36.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WDS

The strongest argument for WDS centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.9% and operating margin at 19.1%. PEG of 1.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : MNR

The primary concerns for MNR are Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : WDS

The primary concerns for WDS are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MNR profiles as a growth stock while WDS is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

WDS carries more volatility with a beta of -0.03 — expect wider price swings.

MNR is growing revenue faster at 36.8% — sustainability is the question.

WDS generates stronger free cash flow (417M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MNR scores higher overall (66/100 vs 53/100) and 36.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Mach Natural Resources LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, founded in 1968, is one of the oldest public equity REITs in the world.

Visit Website →

Woodside Energy Group Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Woodside Energy Group Ltd is engaged in the exploration, evaluation, development, production, marketing and sale of hydrocarbons in Oceania, Asia, Canada, Africa and internationally. The company is headquartered in Perth, Australia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?