WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsMach Natural Resources LP (MNR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 1150% more annual revenue ($14.46B vs $1.16B). MNR leads profitability with a 8.0% profit margin vs 2.0%. MNR trades at a lower P/E of 17.1x. MNR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.28

MNR

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 4.5Value: 6.0Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+40.8%)

Margin of Safety

+40.8%

Fair Value

$285.48

Current Price

$183.39

$102.09 discount

UndervaluedFair: $285.48Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MNR.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$52.49B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

MNR4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.8%10/10

Revenue surging 43.8% year-over-year

P/E RatioValuation
17.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
22.7%8/10

Earnings expanding 22.7% YoY

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

MNR3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
8.0%3/10

8.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Operating MarginProfitability
-2.6%1/10

Operating margin of -2.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : MNR

The strongest argument for MNR centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 43.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 184.8x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : MNR

The primary concerns for MNR are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, Operating Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a value stock while MNR is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.41 — expect wider price swings.

MNR is growing revenue faster at 43.8% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MNR scores higher overall (56/100 vs 41/100) and 43.8% revenue growth. FANG offers better value entry with a 40.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Mach Natural Resources LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, founded in 1968, is one of the oldest public equity REITs in the world.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?