WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsMach Natural Resources LP (MNR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 1267% more annual revenue ($14.29B vs $1.05B). MNR leads profitability with a 13.7% profit margin vs 11.6%. MNR trades at a lower P/E of 12.7x. MNR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

MNR

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.0Value: 8.3Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
MNRUndervalued (+72.3%)

Margin of Safety

+72.3%

Fair Value

$47.00

Current Price

$14.01

$32.99 discount

UndervaluedFair: $47.00Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

MNR5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
30.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 30.6%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
36.8%10/10

Revenue surging 36.8% year-over-year

P/E RatioValuation
12.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
22.7%8/10

Earnings expanding 22.7% YoY

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

MNR2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-57.23M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : MNR

The strongest argument for MNR centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 36.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : MNR

The primary concerns for MNR are Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while MNR is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.57 — expect wider price swings.

MNR is growing revenue faster at 36.8% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MNR scores higher overall (66/100 vs 45/100) and 36.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Mach Natural Resources LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, founded in 1968, is one of the oldest public equity REITs in the world.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?