WallStSmart

MetLife Inc (MET)vsUnum Group (UNM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

MetLife Inc generates 489% more annual revenue ($77.08B vs $13.08B). UNM leads profitability with a 5.7% profit margin vs 4.4%. MET appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.60. MET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

MET

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 5/9

UNM

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.5Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

METSignificantly Overvalued (-146.3%)

Margin of Safety

-146.3%

Fair Value

$32.03

Current Price

$70.39

$38.36 premium

UndervaluedFair: $32.03Overvalued
UNMSignificantly Overvalued (-145.9%)

Margin of Safety

-145.9%

Fair Value

$29.04

Current Price

$74.50

$45.46 premium

UndervaluedFair: $29.04Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MET5 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.608/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
14.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
27.6%8/10

Revenue surging 27.6% year-over-year

Free Cash FlowQuality
$8.09B8/10

Generating 8.1B in free cash flow

UNM2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

P/E RatioValuation
17.4x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

MET3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Profit MarginProfitability
4.4%3/10

4.4% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.7%3/10

Operating margin of 4.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-34.2%2/10

Earnings declined 34.2%

UNM4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.2%4/10

0.2% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
6.7%3/10

ROE of 6.7% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
5.7%3/10

5.7% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MET

The strongest argument for MET centers on PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 27.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.60 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : UNM

The strongest argument for UNM centers on Price/Book, P/E Ratio. PEG of 1.03 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : MET

The primary concerns for MET are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Thin 4.4% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : UNM

The primary concerns for UNM are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MET profiles as a growth stock while UNM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

MET carries more volatility with a beta of 0.74 — expect wider price swings.

MET is growing revenue faster at 27.6% — sustainability is the question.

MET generates stronger free cash flow (8.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MET scores higher overall (63/100 vs 56/100) and 27.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

MetLife Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE - LIFE · USA

MetLife, Inc. is the holding corporation for the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MLIC), better known as MetLife, and its affiliates. MetLife is among the largest global providers of insurance, annuities, and employee benefit programs, with 90 million customers in over 60 countries.

Unum Group

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE - LIFE · USA

Unum Group is a Chattanooga, Tennessee-based Fortune 500 insurance company formerly known as UnumProvident.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?