WallStSmart

LM Funding America Inc (LMFA)vsWells Fargo & Company (WFC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Wells Fargo & Company generates 1163805% more annual revenue ($83.03B vs $7.13M). WFC leads profitability with a 27.2% profit margin vs 0.0%. WFC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 76/100 (B+).

LMFA

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 2.5Value: 5.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -3.63

WFC

Strong Buy

76

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 5.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -0.38

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LMFA1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

WFC6 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$264.72B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Operating MarginProfitability
37.4%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 37.4%

Profit MarginProfitability
27.2%9/10

Keeps 27 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
12.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
25.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 25.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

LMFA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$2.63M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-153.6%2/10

ROE of -153.6% — below average capital efficiency

WFC3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.684/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-0.382/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
2.551/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LMFA

The strongest argument for LMFA centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : WFC

The strongest argument for WFC centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.2% and operating margin at 37.4%.

Bear Case : LMFA

The primary concerns for LMFA are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : WFC

The primary concerns for WFC are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.55 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LMFA profiles as a value stock while WFC is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

LMFA carries more volatility with a beta of 2.40 — expect wider price swings.

WFC is growing revenue faster at 9.5% — sustainability is the question.

WFC generates stronger free cash flow (6.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WFC scores higher overall (76/100 vs 31/100), backed by strong 27.2% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

LM Funding America Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

LM Funding America, Inc., through its subsidiary, LM Funding, LLC, is a specialized finance company. The company is headquartered in Tampa, Florida.

Wells Fargo & Company

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA

Wells Fargo & Company is an American multinational financial services company with corporate headquarters in San Francisco, California, operational headquarters in Manhattan, and managerial offices throughout the United States and overseas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?