Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)vsWells Fargo & Company (WFC)
GS
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$805.48
+0.50%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $242.05B
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
$76.19
+0.26%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $237.79B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Wells Fargo & Company generates 35% more annual revenue ($80.04B vs $59.40B). GS leads profitability with a 28.9% profit margin vs 26.7%. GS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.41. GS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).
GS
Strong Buy73
out of 100
Grade: B
WFC
Strong Buy72
out of 100
Grade: B
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+55.0%
Fair Value
$1797.44
Current Price
$805.48
$991.96 discount
Margin of Safety
+56.0%
Fair Value
$173.78
Current Price
$76.19
$97.59 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Strong operational efficiency at 38.3%
Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
15.2% revenue growth
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Reasonable price relative to book value
Keeps 27 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Strong operational efficiency at 29.9%
Generating 4.1B in free cash flow
Areas to Watch
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Expensive relative to growth rate
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : GS
The strongest argument for GS centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.9% and operating margin at 38.3%. Revenue growth of 15.2% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : WFC
The strongest argument for WFC centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 26.7% and operating margin at 29.9%.
Bear Case : GS
The primary concerns for GS are Free Cash Flow.
Bear Case : WFC
The primary concerns for WFC are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
GS profiles as a growth stock while WFC is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
GS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.34 — expect wider price swings.
GS is growing revenue faster at 15.2% — sustainability is the question.
WFC generates stronger free cash flow (4.1B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
GS scores higher overall (73/100 vs 72/100), backed by strong 28.9% margins and 15.2% revenue growth. WFC offers better value entry with a 56.0% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in New York City. It offers services in investment management, securities, asset management, prime brokerage, and securities underwriting. It also provides investment banking to institutional investors.
Wells Fargo & Company
FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA
Wells Fargo & Company is an American multinational financial services company with corporate headquarters in San Francisco, California, operational headquarters in Manhattan, and managerial offices throughout the United States and overseas.
Compare with Other CAPITAL MARKETS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?