WallStSmart

Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)vsLM Funding America Inc (LMFA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Goldman Sachs Group Inc generates 796960% more annual revenue ($61.53B vs $7.72M). GS leads profitability with a 29.4% profit margin vs 0.0%. GS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 75/100 (B).

GS

Strong Buy

75

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.5Value: 6.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9

LMFA

Avoid

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.5Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GS6 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$274.13B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Operating MarginProfitability
38.4%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 38.4%

Profit MarginProfitability
29.4%9/10

Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
16.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
24.3%8/10

Earnings expanding 24.3% YoY

LMFA1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

GS1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$-32.43B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

LMFA4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$3.95M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Return on EquityProfitability
-84.0%2/10

ROE of -84.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-89.4%2/10

Earnings declined 89.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GS

The strongest argument for GS centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 29.4% and operating margin at 38.4%. Revenue growth of 14.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : LMFA

The strongest argument for LMFA centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : GS

The primary concerns for GS are Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : LMFA

The primary concerns for LMFA are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GS profiles as a mature stock while LMFA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

LMFA carries more volatility with a beta of 2.43 — expect wider price swings.

GS is growing revenue faster at 14.5% — sustainability is the question.

LMFA generates stronger free cash flow (-6M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GS scores higher overall (75/100 vs 35/100), backed by strong 29.4% margins and 14.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in New York City. It offers services in investment management, securities, asset management, prime brokerage, and securities underwriting. It also provides investment banking to institutional investors.

LM Funding America Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

LM Funding America, Inc., through its subsidiary, LM Funding, LLC, is a specialized finance company. The company is headquartered in Tampa, Florida.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?