WallStSmart

Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)vsLM Funding America Inc (LMFA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Goldman Sachs Group Inc generates 947134% more annual revenue ($67.57B vs $7.13M). GS leads profitability with a 31.0% profit margin vs 0.0%. GS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 83/100 (A-).

GS

Exceptional Buy

83

out of 100

Grade: A-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 8.0Value: 6.3Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.14

LMFA

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 2.5Value: 5.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -3.63

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GS6 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
Market CapQuality
$306.11B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Profit MarginProfitability
31.0%10/10

Keeps 31 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
42.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 42.2%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
42.5%10/10

Revenue surging 42.5% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
92.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 92.3% YoY

P/E RatioValuation
16.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

LMFA1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

GS2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.142/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
6.041/10

Elevated debt levels

LMFA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$2.63M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-153.6%2/10

ROE of -153.6% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GS

The strongest argument for GS centers on Market Cap, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 31.0% and operating margin at 42.2%. Revenue growth of 42.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : LMFA

The strongest argument for LMFA centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : GS

The primary concerns for GS are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 6.04 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : LMFA

The primary concerns for LMFA are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GS profiles as a growth stock while LMFA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

LMFA carries more volatility with a beta of 2.40 — expect wider price swings.

GS is growing revenue faster at 42.5% — sustainability is the question.

GS generates stronger free cash flow (5.6B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GS scores higher overall (83/100 vs 31/100), backed by strong 31.0% margins and 42.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in New York City. It offers services in investment management, securities, asset management, prime brokerage, and securities underwriting. It also provides investment banking to institutional investors.

LM Funding America Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

LM Funding America, Inc., through its subsidiary, LM Funding, LLC, is a specialized finance company. The company is headquartered in Tampa, Florida.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?