Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)vsMarathon Digital Holdings Inc (MARA)
GS
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$1,038.68
+1.44%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $314.06B
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings Inc
$12.32
-11.24%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $5.37B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Goldman Sachs Group Inc generates 6991% more annual revenue ($61.53B vs $867.82M). GS leads profitability with a 29.4% profit margin vs -234.8%. MARA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.10. GS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).
GS
Strong Buy73
out of 100
Grade: B
MARA
Hold44
out of 100
Grade: D
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Strong operational efficiency at 38.6%
Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Reasonable price relative to book value
Earnings expanding 24.2% YoY
Growing faster than its price suggests
Earnings expanding 86.7% YoY
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Distress zone — elevated risk
Elevated debt levels
Elevated debt levels
Weak financial health signals
ROE of -91.3% — below average capital efficiency
Revenue declined 18.4%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : GS
The strongest argument for GS centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 29.4% and operating margin at 38.6%. Revenue growth of 14.5% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : MARA
The strongest argument for MARA centers on PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Price/Book. PEG of 0.10 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : GS
The primary concerns for GS are PEG Ratio, Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 6.10 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Bear Case : MARA
The primary concerns for MARA are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
GS profiles as a mature stock while MARA is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.
MARA carries more volatility with a beta of 5.38 — expect wider price swings.
GS is growing revenue faster at 14.5% — sustainability is the question.
MARA generates stronger free cash flow (-327M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
GS scores higher overall (73/100 vs 44/100), backed by strong 29.4% margins and 14.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in New York City. It offers services in investment management, securities, asset management, prime brokerage, and securities underwriting. It also provides investment banking to institutional investors.
Marathon Digital Holdings Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. is a cryptocurrency mining digital asset technology company with a focus on the blockchain ecosystem and digital asset generation in the United States. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Compare with Other CAPITAL MARKETS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?