Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)vsMarathon Digital Holdings Inc (MARA)
GS
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$813.53
+0.50%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $242.05B
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings Inc
$8.46
-8.24%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $3.51B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Goldman Sachs Group Inc generates 6448% more annual revenue ($59.40B vs $907.09M). GS leads profitability with a 28.9% profit margin vs -144.6%. MARA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.10. GS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).
GS
Strong Buy73
out of 100
Grade: B
MARA
Hold49
out of 100
Grade: D+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+55.0%
Fair Value
$1797.44
Current Price
$813.53
$983.91 discount
Intrinsic value data unavailable for MARA.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Strong operational efficiency at 38.3%
Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
15.2% revenue growth
Growing faster than its price suggests
Reasonable price relative to book value
Earnings expanding 86.7% YoY
Areas to Watch
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Weak financial health signals
ROE of -34.5% — below average capital efficiency
Revenue declined 5.6%
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : GS
The strongest argument for GS centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.9% and operating margin at 38.3%. Revenue growth of 15.2% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : MARA
The strongest argument for MARA centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. PEG of 0.10 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : GS
The primary concerns for GS are Free Cash Flow.
Bear Case : MARA
The primary concerns for MARA are Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
GS profiles as a growth stock while MARA is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.
MARA carries more volatility with a beta of 5.42 — expect wider price swings.
GS is growing revenue faster at 15.2% — sustainability is the question.
MARA generates stronger free cash flow (508M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
GS scores higher overall (73/100 vs 49/100), backed by strong 28.9% margins and 15.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in New York City. It offers services in investment management, securities, asset management, prime brokerage, and securities underwriting. It also provides investment banking to institutional investors.
Marathon Digital Holdings Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. is a cryptocurrency mining digital asset technology company with a focus on the blockchain ecosystem and digital asset generation in the United States. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Compare with Other CAPITAL MARKETS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?