WallStSmart

Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)vsMorgan Stanley (MS)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Morgan Stanley generates 12% more annual revenue ($79.79B vs $71.04B). GS leads profitability with a 31.2% profit margin vs 25.6%. GS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.12. GS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 83/100 (A-).

GS

Exceptional Buy

83

out of 100

Grade: A-

Growth: 9.3Profit: 8.0Value: 6.3Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.14

MS

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.0Value: 5.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.38

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GS6 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$260.47B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Profit MarginProfitability
31.2%10/10

Keeps 31 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
38.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 38.2%

P/E RatioValuation
12.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

MS5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$288.43B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Operating MarginProfitability
39.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 39.9%

Profit MarginProfitability
25.6%9/10

Keeps 26 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
14.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

GS2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.142/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
6.711/10

Elevated debt levels

MS2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.614/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.382/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GS

The strongest argument for GS centers on Market Cap, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 31.2% and operating margin at 38.2%. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MS

The strongest argument for MS centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 25.6% and operating margin at 39.9%. Revenue growth of 10.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : GS

The primary concerns for GS are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 6.71 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : MS

The primary concerns for MS are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GS profiles as a growth stock while MS is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

GS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.28 — expect wider price swings.

GS is growing revenue faster at 23.3% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor CAPITAL MARKETS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

GS scores higher overall (83/100 vs 72/100), backed by strong 31.2% margins and 23.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in New York City. It offers services in investment management, securities, asset management, prime brokerage, and securities underwriting. It also provides investment banking to institutional investors.

Morgan Stanley

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Morgan Stanley is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered at 1585 Broadway in the Morgan Stanley Building, Midtown Manhattan, New York City.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?